Cross-strait crime has been increasingly worrisome as cross-strait ties have been getting closer in recent years. Three Chinese illegal migrants suspected in the murder of a taxi driver engaging in a gunbattle with police a few days ago in Taichung County was the most recent case. The police are still investigating whether the three Chinese might be professional killers hired by a local crime ring.
Some may still remember the shocking murdering of former Taoyuan County Commissioner Liu Pang-yu (
According to one TV reporter covering the crime beat, Chinese gangsters have the reputation of being inexpensive and cold-blooded, and so are favored by local crime rings when muscle is called for. They have reportedly even been classified into three categories -- according to their training -- which then determines their price.
The most professional and expensive killers, according to the TV reporter, are those who once served in the People Liberation Army's special units. The second tier are those who used to serve as police. The third tier are the generalists who lack special training.
Hong Kong, as usual, can serve as an example for Taiwan in this regard. People in the territory have been using the term "ta chuan tzai" (
Most of the Chinese gangsters who have committed crimes in this country sneaked in illegally, usually via fishing boats, and left after completing their missions. Since they don't go through any immigration formalities, the police have no means of tracing them. This more or less encourages local gangs to hire them for high-risk endeavors. However, police say some have come under the cover of tourism or visiting relatives to look for crime opportunities.
Since cross-strait smuggling is rampant, Chinese gangsters also view Taiwan as a land of opportunity for petty crime. But cross-strait crime is not a unilateral problem for Taiwan. Organized crime committed by Taiwanese rings in China is increasing.
In addition, many high-profile Taiwanese gang leaders and fugitives are hiding in China. In order to stay safe in China, some gang leaders, such as Chang An-le (
A joint effort at cross-strait crime prevention is urgently needed. Hong Kong has established a joint anti-crime mechanism with China. Taiwan's cooperation with China in fighting crime rests on cross-strait understandings and agreements. But Beijing cut such dialogue in 1995, to protest then president Lee Teng-hui's (
It was childish and irresponsible to cut off cross-strait discussion on creating a crime-prevention network for political reasons. It is also short-sighted of Beijing to protect Taiwanese criminals just because they are willing to support unification. A soaring crime rate is already a major domestic problem for the Chinese authorities. But they also must face up to their international responsibilities and show a willingness to help crackdown on cross-strait crime.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS