Now that the two opposition parties have concluded their China sojourns it is time for the people of Taiwan to sit back and look at what these two trips have actually achieved, and analyze what results a potential peace or bridge-building deal with China would mean for Taiwan's future.
After selling their souls to the devil for some much-needed publicity, it seems that all that the pan-blue camp's leaders can promise is something the people already have, and the only thing by which the Chinese Communist Party holds onto power is economic prosperity. What else could a future agreement offer the good people of this country?
From the speeches and communiques issued by Lien and Soong, it seems that under a future pan-blue deal with China, anyone who supports Taiwanese independence can expect to be thrown into jail, or at the very least have their efforts disrupted by the state.
What a step forward -- the return of political prisoners. And as China and Taiwan's democracy received equal amounts of praise and scorn respectively from one of its distinguished guests, then it can be assumed that under any future pact Taiwanese can also look forward to sham elections, where crude restriction tactics are used against anyone opposing the ruling party, and in which non-ruling party winners are not allowed to assume their positions.
Sounds all too familiar, doesn't it? It would be like the return of the tangwai (outside the party) days. It seems that as the pan-blues cannot get the results they desire from a democratic system and so their answer is to revert to a system where they can guarantee their own political futures at the expense of the freedom of Taiwan's population. Another winning option -- the return of the White Terror era.
In fact, the only good thing to have come from these two pitiable propaganda trips is that the Taiwanese people have finally had a chance to see what kind of future lies in store for them if they should ever re-elect a pan-blue government.
Hopefully enough damage has been done to ensure that this will never happen, and that Taiwan's future will be as an independent state, and not as the 23rd province of China.
Henry Blackhand
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath