On March 7, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi -- disregarding Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing's (
If we look closer, a number of facts lie behind Japan's stance, including repeated incursions into its waters by Chinese nuclear-powered submarines, the sovereignty dispute over the Tiaoyutai and China's military budget, which has grown by double-digit figures for 16 consecutive years.
Taiwan has kept a low profile on this development, and has purposely not linked it to China's notorious "anti-secession" law, so as to avoid Chinese interference in a more formal partnership among Taiwan, Japan and the US in the future. Nevertheless, the future of the US-Japan alliance and relations with China, as well as their impact on the cross-strait situation have received global attention.
Beijing, apart from lobbying the EU to lift an arms embargo against China, also outlined three conditions for using the "anti-secession" law during a meeting of the National People's Congress' on March 8. The law authorizes the military to block Taiwan independence by using "non-peaceful means." Obviously, it was a move against the joint statement of the US-Japan Security Consultative Committee.
The next day, US officials immediately reacted to China's destruction of the balance of power in the Strait, saying that the law contradicts the gradual warming of cross-strait relations. They called on Beijing to reconsider it, saying that Washington "opposes any attempt to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means."
They also hinted that, apart from issuing a tougher statement after the law is passed, Washington will further show its concern during Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's visit to Beijing.
Meanwhile, some members of the US Congress have already launched a petition against the law. Viewed from this angle, Washington's strategic global deployment can be seen -- with the US-Japan alliance being made the pillar of security in the Asia-Pacific region in order to restrain China from breaking through the island chain.
Taiwan is one of the countries peripheral to the US-Japan alliance. Taiwan should make use of the developments of both the US-Japan joint statement and China's law. Strategically, it should adjust its actions to the circumstances to give full play to its crucial position in the island chain. The following are my suggestions for the national security agencies.
First, Taiwan can open a window of opportunity by strengthening the US-Japan alliance. In the short term, it should focus on how to rapidly promote favorable policies. In the long term, it should integrate its various diplomatic, military and economic resources related to the US and Japan, and seek to play the role of an active strategic partner.
Second, although Taiwan is backed by the US-Japan security cooperation, the lack of an official military partnership with the two countries makes it necessary to declare its determination to defend itself to the world through "reasonable and practical" arms procurements.
Finally, in terms of military exchanges, Taiwan should cultivate talented people who are sophisticated in dealing with the US and Japan, and build a preliminary military exchange mechanism with Japan through the US. They can even push for triangular "war games" through private think tanks.
Henry Liu is the chief of the international news section at the Ministry of National Defense's military spokesman office. The views expressed in this article are his own and do not necessarily represent MND policy.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath