If China passes its ridiculous "anti-secession" law, one possible response from Taiwan worth considering is to boycott the Beijing Olympics in 2008.
Just think of the media exposure this boycott will get. For the next three years, every time the Beijing Olympics are mentioned in the news, Taiwan will also be mentioned. The world will be constantly reminded that Taiwan is independent from China and has its own laws and Constitution.
It would be best if this action is based on a snap referendum to show it is the people's will, not just government policy. In the long term, it will be a negative legacy for the games that China still disregards human rights and freedom.
Some may argue that this action would mix sports with politics, but it would not be the first time. Apart from considering the way the Chinese government and people may treat Taiwanese-owned businesses in China, Taiwan does not have much to lose, since its flag and anthem are not allowed anyway. On the business side, money still has to be made, since many companies are publicly traded.
I think Taiwan's anthem actually has a very nice melody. I have it drilled into my head from all the movies I watched here years ago.
Perhaps Taiwan should have a contest to compose new and more meaningful words to the song during this time, so that people here will be reminded of the sacrifice made.
Perhaps as a temporary message, activists can replace the star on the flag with a peace symbol to show the world that Taiwan only wants peace and stability. It would be a good image to get the message across in the media.
Marc Plumb
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath