The sensational events of the nation's Legislative Yuan speakership and vice speakership elections are now over, and though there was plenty of intrigue, it achieved little, for the overall blue-green division of the political map remains unchanged. And most of what was sensational about it proved to have been orchestrated by the politicians themselves, with the media painting a picture of a minority government full of hope and an opposition in the throes of anxiety.
The "intrigue" was little more than gimmicks used by politicians to enhance their position.
The media's coverage made pan-green supporters believe that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Ker Chien-ming (
The pan-greens have nothing to feel disappointed about in the election results, nor do the pan-blues have anything to rejoice over. The political map was already very clear cut, and if the so-called "intrigue" had managed to turn the tables, is there any guarantee that they would not turn back again in 10 days or a month's time?
What would have happened if Ker had bought off legislators eager to sell themselves to the highest bidder and managed to win the speakership that way? Would it be plain sailing for him? Frankly, both the green and blue camps risked being found out or double-crossed, for if this had happened both sides would have needed to engage in secret deals that would not bear scrutiny.
That Ker fought for the speakership is understandable, but pan-green politicians have behaved like junkies who constantly need a fix. And as for pan-green supporters, if Ker had won through secret deals, they might have seen their "green" candidate undermined by "blue" influence. In this case, how could a speaker from a minority party have directed the legislature?
The pan-green camp may not be that foolish. Although they vowed to win over some pan-blue legislators during the legislative speakership election, they apparently did not, metaphorically speaking, put their money on the table. On the other hand, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) had to put up with its legislators putting themselves up for auction. If the pathetic KMT had ended up losing the speakership as well, then it would have suffered an irreparable loss of face.
Soong has come out of the election best. He has returned to Taiwan, [after visiting the US to speak with government officials there], and clearly no longer has any fear of the Chung Hsiung Bills Finance scandal (
Now it is the Year of the Rooster, and Taiwan's cocky politicians are crowing to herald a new spring of political power. But is this a new spring for the Taiwanese people as well? The basic call from politicians is "I want power," and they differ only their demands for either "recognition of `one China'" or "Taiwan's sovereignty."
They believe that these hackneyed phrases are the most exulted of harmonies.
These cockerels regard the people as capons, emasculated and ineffective, capable only of making a fuss on the sidelines. But have the politicians ever discussed what they would do should they become legislative speaker, vice premier or head of the Straits Exchange Foundation? If they have not, then they certainly are showing contempt for the power of the people.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath