Over the past few days, President Chen Shui-bian (
Although such cooperation is a beautiful vision, the foundation for such cooperation is weak. The two sides have long been involved in a struggle and there are the differences in national identification. Only if the parties are able to rid themselves of political baggage and give a little will they be able to get what they want.
Hsieh has pinpointedthe main issue -- the conflict over unification or independence. Whether cooperation will be successful also requires mutual respect. Hsieh's statements that the government will not initiate a change of national title must be seen as an expression of respect for the opposition. The public's wishes should be expressed in government policy; when public consensus is wanting, there should be a dialogue between the political parties and society.
Opposition requests that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) amend its independence clause are, however, excessive. A democratic society must be able to tolerate a diversity of opinions, and demands that one's opponent abandon core convictions should not be a premise for cooperation.
The new Cabinet could build a platform for cooperation between government and opposition by adopting three principles: the rule of law, democracy and the separation between party and state. The principle of the rule of law stipulates that both government and opposition respect the existing constitutional framework in order to build coherent national identification.
We all recognize the Republic of China (ROC). Instead of spelling out "the one China framework within the ROC Constitution," Hsieh only has to say "the Constitutional ROC" and leave that to the interpretation of the opposition parties. The DPP can continue to promote "one China and one Taiwan," and the People First Party (PFP) can talk about "one virtual but two actual Chinas." No matter how they phrase it, the fact remains that the ROC is different from the PRC. This way of building national recognition on the existing framework can be exchanged for the opposition's cooperation in protecting Taiwan.
Taiwan is a democratic society that allows a diversity of values and ideals, and democracy is the main reason for Taiwan's existence and its most important value. Some may ask whether continued DPP insistence on independence and continued Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and PFP insistence on "one China" will mean that the fighting between government and opposition will continue as in the past.
Hsieh's division between government policy and social or political movements is correct. The DPP can continue to praise independence or initiate changes to the national title, but the Cabinet should set policies according to public consensus.
The formation of social consensus of course has to consider the position of opposition parties. Future cooperation or negotiation should be between the party caucuses in the legislature and between the Cabinet and the legislature, not between the central leaderships of the various parties.
It is to be hoped that the three-pronged policy emphasizing the economy, social welfare and justice and cultural development that Hsieh has proposed will be implemented. The development of the non-economic aspects of this policy ideal will form a necessary social and cultural basis for economic development. The only way to give free reign to the massive energy of the people is to prevent decision-making mechanisms being hijacked by parties, corporations, official experts or academics.
Allen Houng is chairman of Taipei Society.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath