I am extremely concerned about Taiwan's economic situation this year.
The three most worrisome variables are whether or not there will be social turmoil in China, the possible impact of the proposed anti-secession law, and whether or not the opposition will continue to boycott every proposal made by the government.
These variables have the potential to adversely affect Taiwan's economic situation. Therefore, the government must have strategies so that it can respond.
Reports forecasting GDP growth for this year have been published one after another, with its value is predicted to be within the range of 4.5 percent to 5 percent.
Based on the current situation, it appears that these figures are more than likely to be overestimated.
Why am I so pessimistic?
First, the probability of social turmoil in China has never been greater than this coming year.
Factors such as the unequal distribution of income in that society, the continuous widening of the gap between rich and poor, and unequal development of China's provinces, have all resulted in an increased potential for social upheaval, which is by all appearances already at an explosive stage.
On top of that, China's economy this year will certainly experience a downturn, which will act as a catalyst to popular unrest.
In addition, Taiwan's excessive concentration of exports in China makes its [domestic] situation more vulnerable to the situation there.
The second variable, the proposed anti-secession law, is relevant, too.
How much pressure will China put on Taiwan?
To what length will it go in its discrimination and degradation of Taiwan in the international community?
These issues have the potential to influence Taiwan's economy in a fairly short period of time.
It is especially unfortunate to learn that certain people in Taiwan are echoing China's demands and causing other Taiwanese to suffer a heavy blow to their confidence, doubling the effect of the anti-secession bill.
The third variable involves domestic politics: will the opposition continue to boycott the government's policies?
Despite the political slogans pronouncing "inter-party reconciliation" after last year's legislative elections, I am still not optimistic that this will actually happen.
After reviewing the lawmakers' budget review in the last legislative session on Jan. 21, we could see no substantial manifestation of "inter-party reconciliation."
The opposition parties remain as unreasonable as ever, joining together to slash the government budget.
People cannot help being worried that newly elected legislators may adopt an even more extreme "scorched-earth policy" to show off their power, opposing the DPP administration at every turn.
It is safe to predict that Taiwan's economy will almost definitely suffer in terms of market confidence.
Simply put, these three variables may lead to a worsening of Taiwan's economy in the coming year.
I believe the economy will be worse than the expected outlook forecast by both domestic and international agencies.
The government must be prepared for the impact these crises will cause, and efficiently implement practical and feasible countermeasures.
Chen Po-chih is chairman of Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath