US President George W. Bush entered his second, four-year term Thursday pledging to set the US on a course to end tyranny in the world in a speech aimed at laying out his vision and defining his legacy.
In his second inaugural address, Bush spoke generally of expanding freedom throughout the world. He did not mention specific policies or countries, and unlike most of the president's foreign policy addresses, Iraq and the war on terrorism were not directly discussed.
Instead, the president outlined a broader, more idealistic agenda, framing the world as a struggle between freedom and the repression that breeds violence and insecurity and called for unity among free nations to spread liberty.
"For as long as whole regions of the world simmer in resentment and tyranny, prone to ideologies that feed hatred and excuse murder, violence will gather and multiply in destructive power," Bush said.
"There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment and expose the pretensions of tyrants and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom," he said.
But the president, in working to achieve his vision, faces some tough realities. His message is likely to be viewed skeptically in Europe, where US intentions have been questioned -- mainly because of the war in Iraq and disdain for American hegemony.
Bush will have to manage tricky relationships with countries like China, on whom the US relies for trade, and Saudi Arabia, a key oil exporter, but two countries the US government regularly criticizes for human rights abuses.
Opinion polls have shown that the American public has also grown increasingly weary of the war in Iraq and worries that the president does not have a clear exit strategy as his administration tries to build a democratic government there in the midst of a bloody insurgency.
Bush sought to allay concerns about the overuse of American military power, saying force is not the only means for promoting democracy and that the US will not impose its will on other countries.
"This is not primarily the task of arms, though we will defend ourselves and our friends by force of arms when necessary," he said.
"Freedom by its nature must be chosen and defended by citizens and sustained by the rule of law and the protection of minorities."
"America will not impose our own style of government on the unwilling," he said. "Our goal, instead, is to help others find their own voice, attain their own freedom and make their own way."
But he also reminded allies that unity is essential for defeating threats and keeping borders secure.
"Division among free nations is a primary goal of freedom's enemies," he said. "The concerted effort of free nations to promote democracy is a prelude to our enemies' defeat."
Bush has expressed his willingness to reach out to countries like France and Germany, whose relations with the US have been frayed over Iraq. Bush is planning a trip next month to Germany, where he is sure to be greeted by thousands of protestors.
Bush will have a chance next month to discuss the specifics of his global vision when he delivers the annual State of the Union address.
One of his closest advisers, Karen Hughes, told CNN that Thursday's speech was aimed at laying out broad themes and that the president will get into the details in the State of the Union, which is traditionally a much longer address.
For now, Bush focused on molding his legacy like previous presidents who have had an enduring presence, like Ronald Reagan, a man Bush is known to admire. Bush even evoked the memory of Abraham Lincoln, who ended slavery in the US.
"Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it," Bush said, borrowing a phrase from Lincoln.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath