Show us the programming
It was a year ago that International Community Radio Taipei's (ICRT) morning team of Rick Monday and Bill Thissen began a petition to bring its audience better cable TV. The individual chambers of commerce, the Community Services Center and other organizations joined the effort by putting a petition on their Web sites.
Over 30,000 listeners responded and the petition was handed to the Government Information Office director. Today I have more and better choices of cable TV programming. That cooperation between ICRT and the English-speaking community is missing under general manager Janet Chu (朱雅如).
Anthony van Dyck and Gus Adapon's suggestion ("Keep the ICRT true to its mandate," Jan. 10, page 8) that the business community contribute NT$1,000 per year for quality English-language radio programming got me thinking. If those 30,000 listeners who signed Rick and Bill's petition each contributed NT$1,000 a year to bringing back a quality morning show, ICRT would receive revenue of NT$30 million from a three-hour show. Chu could then do whatever she wanted during the other hours and ICRT would still survive.
ICRT chairman Nelson Chang (張安平) seems to be saying "show me the money and I'll bring back professional announcers." The message, it seems to me, should be "show us quality programming" and then ask for sponsorship.
CK Rusty Lee
Neihu
ICRT part of our existence
Thank you for bringing out in public the ICRT's issues concerning the international community in Taiwan. ICRT's primary mandate is to serve the international community and to bridge the gap between cultures, which makes the station vital and useful to both international and local audiences.
With all these improper changes at ICRT, such as going from English programming to "Chinglish" and cutting down on all important shows and free community service ads, it has alienated its own benefactors -- the foreign community. Therefore, the international community is appealing for help and support to bring back the real ICRT with its high standard of English programming and community-based services.
Our concerns and opinions about the station's effectiveness have not even been polled, so why the abrupt changes from a non-profit station to ambitious business competition? I hope that Nelson Chang (張安平) [chairman of the Taipei International Community Cultural Foundation] could resolve this as soon as possible by bringing back the original programming.
It is to be hoped that support from the foreign community will come to light as losing the station means losing a vital part of our very existence in Taiwan.
Irene de Pablo
Taipei
Who cares?
After reading, painfully, "Keep ICRT true to its mandate" (Jan. 10, page 8), I can't help but wonder: Who cares about a lousy radio station like ICRT? I don't.
Jerome Favre
Taipei
Bring back the old ICRT
Does it seem odd to anyone else that ICRT chairman Nelson Chang is on the one hand asking corporations to support ICRT while at the same time refusing to bring back the programming schedule ICRT's listeners are asking for?
Chang can do anything he wants with his station, but if he presents programming that only he wants, then he needs to ask KGI Securities, Taiwan Cement and the China Trust bank to sponsor ICRT.
How many businesses will be willing to fund a radio station based solely on a promise to reverse its strategy? Chang, bring back the programming, then ask for support.
Jamie Yang
Banciao
Who killed ICRT?
It used to be a big pleasure to listen to this radio channel. It used to be a station with a foreign flavor. It used to be great when students were able to understand ICRT. The attractive male and female voices attracted thousands and thousands of listeners. It used to be full of mystery.
Right now, an unknown tornado has turned it upside down. Listeners don't know why they are tuning in to FM100 anymore. They don't know if the DJs' English usage is correct. Listeners don't want to be part of the ICRT gang anymore. Sad. Listeners are mostly turning off our favorite radio station because there aren't any familiar DJs, except for Ron Stewart.
Many times listeners cannot even find the channel, because the music and voices are almost indistinguishable from other local radio stations. Who killed ICRT? Who will give the listeners the answer? I do care.
Liya Su
Banciao
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s