Lin Yuan Group and Shin Kong Group have achieved enormous success in Taiwan's insurance sector.
Conversely, the government-funded national health insurance program has been operating listlessly on the verge of bankruptcy.
The program is very likely to collapse completely unless premiums are increased drastically.
If private firms such as Lin Yuan and Shin Kong can achieve such great profits, why is the National Health Insurance program, which is supported by the government and mandated by legislation, suffering from financial difficulties?
It is a common-sense rule of insurance that if a person keeps having accidents, their insurance premiums will increase, or the company will simply refuse to insure them.
If the government prohibits an insurer from raising its premiums or refusing to issue coverage, the insurer is bound to go bankrupt.
This is what has happened in Taiwan.
Expenditures for the national health insurance program have increased as a consequence of the aging population, the introduction of modern medical technology and a greater number of seriously ill patients.
The government, together with the general public, has obstructed premium adjustments on the grounds that low-income households will be unable to pay higher premiums, and that people simply cannot bear the financial burden of such an increase.
The national health insurance program's incessant financial crises come from the fact that it is being run as if it were a social-welfare program.
No wonder that the program is doomed to failure in the way that most welfare programs have been over the years.
Two years ago, Lee Ming-liang (
He met resistance from opposition parties and a number of civil groups. The policy, however, at least helped the national insurance program to carry on for another two years.
The financial circumstances of the program are now, once again, approaching crisis. The government is again planning to hike premiums.
No matter how hard we work to make the national insurance program perform well, all the remedies we take will prove futile if it continues to be conducted as a welfare program.
The root of this program's financial woes is that we have paid too much attention to the welfare aspect of it.
However affluent a society is, there are still people who cannot afford to pay their premiums and other related expenses.
It is part of social welfare for a government to take care of the financially disadvantaged.
However, this country's health insurance program will never be able to shake off its financial difficulties if we insist on taking the financially disadvantaged hostage to force the program to ignore market mechanisms and assume total financial liability.
If we want to see the healthcare system prevail in the long-term, we should separate the health insurance program from social welfare and let the market decide premiums.
If we fail to do this, we should at least make sure that health insurance does not lean too obviously toward social welfare.
Kuo Cheng-deng is an Associate Professor at the School of Medicine of National Yang Ming University.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing