The UN has launched a US$90 million operation to reach four million Iraqi expatriates
A last-minute push to prepare millions of Iraqis living overseas to vote in the critical elections in their homeland this month has been launched by the UN.
With only four weeks until the poll, there are still no clear estimates of how many expatriate Iraqis might be eligible to vote, though analysts agree that they could determine its outcome. Around 250,000 Iraqis live in Britain -- one of the biggest expatriate communities -- with up to four million spread elsewhere around the world.
In one of the biggest exercises of its type, costing around US$90 million, tens of thousands of volunteers in 15 countries are working frantically to register Iraqis who are aged over 18.
In Britain, three registration centers will be set up next month in preparation for polling on 30 January.
The booths will be manned by Iraqis living in the UK, though security will be in the hands of local police. Around 600 Iraqi exiles in Britain will be trained by the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the UN body mandated by the Iraqi electoral commission to conduct the poll.
"There is a huge amount of enthusiasm," said Sarah Fradgley, an IOM spokesperson in London. "Some people have complained there are only three centers, but we have pointed out that, if they were living in Tokyo, they would have to go to Los Angeles."
Kasim Murthada, chairman of the Iraqi Community Council in Wales, is one of the many Iraqis in the UK consulted by the IOM about arrangements for the poll. "The elections are vital for a united, human, democratic and civilized Iraq," said Murthada, who has lived in Swansea since 1978. "I am very excited."
The British vote is expected to follow patterns in Iraq, where the Shia Muslims, who comprise 60 per cent of the population, are expected to dominate. Most expatriate Iraqis are Shia or from the Kurdish minority. Both groups suffered disproportionately under Saddam Hussein, who favoured Iraq's Sunni Muslim minority.
Ahmed Shames, who runs an Iraqi pro-democracy network, said that Sunni Iraqis in Britain were generally less enthusiastic about voting. "Their leadership in Iraq is still suspicious of the election," he said. "The leaders of the Shias have told them all to vote."
Preparations are also under way in 14 other countries with substantial Iraqi communities. Egypt was a late addition to a list drawn up in the autumn. From Jordan, a three-minute public service announcement is being aired on pan-Arab satellite networks and state-run local radio and television. Voter education material is being published in international Arabic newspapers.
UN officials say that it will cost about US$90 a head for the expatriates to register and vote, compared with US$24 for each voter in Iraq.
The Iraqi electoral commission decided to allow out-of-country voting despite opposition from the UN team, which argued that it would be very costly, posed logistical problems and might be prone to fraud. However, political parties in Iraq put pressure on the commission to allow it.
"There will be allegations, fraud and all that," said the UN official organizing the poll. "But though the commission felt that was a problem ... they felt that the integrity of the process will also be questioned if out-of-country voting was not taken."
In Manchester, England, Iraqis were enthusiastic. Diyari Askander, who came to Britain 14 years ago from Suleymaniya in northern Iraq, said that he wanted a peaceful election and a government which "understands human rights and will be fair to the Iraqi people."
"Of course people in Manchester will come and vote,' he added. 'It doesn't matter what religious backgrounds they come from, they all want to see the situation improve. At the moment there are thousands of people suffering every week."
How the election will work
What will the Iraqis be voting for?
They will be electing a 275-member interim national assembly, which will select a government and draft a constitution.
How will the poll be organized?
Largely due to the difficult security situation, Iraq will be considered as a single electoral entity. It will not be divided into wards, states or other units. The number of seats in the assembly will be apportioned according to proportional representation. The more votes a party gets, the more seats it will win. Of those seats, 25 percent must be filled by women. The system allows exiles to vote without having to return to their "homes" and guarantees the right of smaller parties to compete.
Isn't that a problem in areas with poor security?
Yes. Areas where security is particularly bad -- such as the Sunni Triangle -- are likely to see much higher levels of intimidation on polling day than the more stable Shia and Kurdish areas.
Why not postpone the vote until there is better security?
Iraqis disagree over postponement. The Shia parties, who stand to benefit most from a January poll when Sunnis are struggling to get out the vote, will brook no delay. Sunni politicians are keen to postpone.
Who will monitor the fairness of the elections?
Voters will be marked with indelible ink after casting their ballot. However it is likely that attacks and intimidation will take place. International election monitors will not be in Iraq, but in Jordan.
Who will win?
The United Iraqi Alliance list has been put together in consultation with Ayatollah al-Sistani, the leading Shia cleric.
Although its 228 candidates are dominated by Shias, it has been careful to include Christians, Turkomen, Sunnis and Kurds. It does not include the followers of Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. Fatwas have been issued by the Shia community encouraging Shias to vote, so there will be a significant Shia majority.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing