In 1989, the Berlin Wall came down. In 1991, the Soviet Union disintegrated and Deng Xiaoping (
Deng hit the nail on the head -- 15 years on, we can already see the outlines of a new cold war. But Deng didn't get it all right, for he saw the new cold war in terms of a direct confrontation between a socialist nation with Chinese characteristics and a capitalist America.
But in fact, the new cold war seems to be shaping up as a confrontation between a Chinese-Russian alliance and the US, Japan, South Korea and the EU on the one hand, and a battle between Eastern authoritarianism and Western democracy on the other. In the power politics of this struggle for hegemony, the new cold war is not much different from the old cold war. But in regard to the ideological struggle, there are some differences.
I have often pointed out, especially in countering the arguments presented in Samuel Huntington's The Clash of Civilizations, that this conflict is not between Eastern Confucianism and Western Christianity, nor is it a clash between Christian and Islamic civilization. In fact it is a battle between Eastern authoritarianism and Western liberal democracy.
Recently, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan have all released new national defense policy reports. Most notably, Japan's national defense white paper for the first time clearly points to the rise of China's military capability, noting that China's military budget now exceeds that of Japan, and that the threat posed by China is a fact that Japan can no longer afford to ignore.
Japan believes it must now rethink its national defense strategy and strengthen its military preparations, building up its security and defense system on the basis that China is its primary adversary. It has established an Asia-Pacific strategic security network with the US, North Korea and other Asian countries and has hinted at Taiwan's participation.
A cold war between Japan and Russia has persisted ever since the end of WWII due to the unresolved issue of Japan's "northern territories," which has caused Japan to see Russia as an enemy.
In addition, the North Korean nuclear weapons issue is still unresolved, and Pyongyang and Tokyo are caught in a hostile face-off. Problems abound in the region and the alliances between Beijing and Pyongyang, and between Japan and the US, make the atmosphere of a cold war inescapable. It is palpable even when you are aren't looking.
Japan and the US are making huge strides with the development of a missile defense system, and not only has Japan purchased AEGIS-equipped destroyers, it has even violated its "peace constitution" by selling advanced missile defense technology to the US. Naturally, combined Japanese, US and South Korean military exercises are taking place with increasing frequency. Looking at China and Russia, we see that they have finally resolved border disputes that have plagued relations between the two nations for half a century, with Beijing making considerable concessions.
In the aftermath of the Soviet collapse, Russia sold vast quantities of advanced military technology to China, including missiles, fighter jets, Sovremenny class destroyers, kilo-class submarines and radar systems. There are even rumors that the Russians are considering selling China aircraft carriers. Recently, the largest ever Chinese-Russian military exercises were held, and analysts believe that the trend these exercises represent for Chinese-Russian relations cannot be ignored.
The forceful leadership of Russian President Vladimir Putin and his suppression of democracy, media and his political enemies is reflected in China by President Hu Jintao (
History is destined to repeat itself. Deng's prediction that the end of the Cold War would simply be the beginning of a new cold war was spot on. More frightening still are the numerous similarities between the new and the old. The difference is that the old Cold War was a confrontation between communism and capitalism, while the new is between totalitarianism and democracy.
In the old Cold War, the forces of communism collapsed; in the new cold war, history has ordained that the forces of totalitarianism will be defeated. Although the Chinese-Russian alliance may well bring the fight to the joint forces of the US, Japan and the EU, they cannot and will not achieve victory. Does the "peacefully rising" China want history to repeat itself and cause a new cold war to begin, or does it have the will to turn its back on totalitarianism and take the right path of history by embracing democracy?
This all depends on Hu, Chinese premier Wen Jiabao (
Chiou Chwei-liang is a visiting professor at Tamkang University.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS