China is not the enemy
Although I generally respect John Tkacik's views on US-China relations, his recent remarks that Taiwan should strengthen its defense before building a new nation ("US analyst urges Taiwan to make defense a priority," Nov. 29, page 4) strike me as ill-advised, if not totally irresponsible.
First, is it a matter of urgency for Taiwan to "build a new nation?" According to the most recent survey by the Mainland Affairs Council, the majority of Taiwanese still seem to prefer the status quo. Taiwanese society remains divided on the issue of spending billions of US dollars on purchasing weapons from the US. The Taiwanese economy is still slowly recovering. For ordinary Taiwanese, there is really no need at this point to rush into building a new nation.
Second, will strengthened defense be enough for Taiwan to "build a new nation?" Apparently Tkacik thinks Mao Zedong's (
Third, Tkacik suggests that the US will always support "a determined democratic Taiwan." This may not be true either. History shows that the US only supports what accords with its national interests. If the establishment of a new Taiwanese nation is not in the interests of the US (and probably it is not, right now, since it may trigger a war across the Taiwan Strait that will involve the US), then the US may not come to Taiwan's aid even if Taiwan is democratic and determined.
Instead of making defense a priority, Taiwan should probably make improving relations across the Taiwan Strait a priority. The best defense for Taiwan is building bridges with China, not burning them. Instead of treating China as an enemy, the Taiwanese government can take the opportunity of China's rise to shape and influence the development within China. A more prosperous and democratic China with which Taiwan is closely associated will provide the best defense for Taiwan's democracy and way of life.
ZHU ZHIQUN
Assistant Professor, University of Bridgeport, Connecticut
Sisy Chen got it backwards
Talk show host Sisy Chen (陳文茜) recently compared the situation after the election in Taiwan to that in Ukraine. She compared the pan-blue alliance to supporters of Viktor Yuschenko (a pro-Western liberal).
There is no resemblance. Yuschenko and his supporters, mainly from the western part of Ukraine, are active and ready to take the destiny of the country in their own hands. They realize the danger coming from Russia, which still considers Ukraine as its sphere of influence. In this situation, Yuschenko's block is fighting for both democracy and independence. They know that if they want to decide their own future they must be independent from Russia. While the authoritarian tendencies are increasing in Russia, they choose democracy.
The pan-blue block does resemble the supporters of [Prime Minister] Viktor Yanukovych, the pro-Moscow candidate: They are still terrified, cannot face the changes, and have not fully developed their identity.
In Ukraine, as in Taiwan, there are two blocks. One demonstrates an active patriotism and is on the way to building a new country; the other is passive, reluctant to reform and still living in the past.
Hanna Shen
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing