Economic growth is essential for poverty reduction. But rapid economic expansion in the developing world is often associated with environmental degradation.
Here in Asia, the tremendous growth over the past few decades has put sustainable development at the forefront of the public agenda. People of Asia are now suffering from the huge costs of growth: vastly diminished mangrove forests, dying coral reefs, the depletion of fisheries, land degradation, alarming levels of air pollution, and the extinction of species, just to name a few.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Growth must continue. Sustainable growth is key to achieving a poverty-free Asia-Pacific region. But the "grow now, clean up later" approach to development is simply not sustainable.
Fortunately, we are now starting to see a shift in the political will in Asia to address the environmental consequences of growth. We also see the private sector, especially companies based in Europe, North America and Japan, moving towards greater corporate social and environmental responsibility and accountability.
The conservation community has led the way in building successful frameworks for cooperation with the private sector, but much more can and should be done. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is currently preparing a report entitled Asian Environment Outlook 2005, to be completed early next year, which examines how cooperative approaches can promote environmentally sustainable development.
The report will explore how corporations can improve their environmental performance and accountability, and suggest new business opportunities as the region moves towards a more sustainable pattern of growth.
There is tremendous scope for building partnerships among governments, the private sector, the development community and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to address environmental sustainability in a collaborative, more effective manner.
At the ADB, we are committed to working with our partners to halt environmental degradation. For example, ADB is working with the Global Environmental Facility and the People's Republic of China to arrest land degradation in north and northwest China. We are working with partners in the Pacific to better manage fish stocks and protect coral reefs. And we are working with partners in Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal to improve regional air quality management in South Asia.
ADB relies on institutions like the World Conservation Union (known as IUCN) and others to complement and build on our development expertise by contributing specialized knowledge and experience. ADB and IUCN have collaborated on a number of environment and conservation projects over the years. We have just signed a Memorandum of Understanding that reinforces our partnership, and acknowledges our common aims of poverty reduction and environmentally sustainable development.
Both institutions recognize that, given the scale and complexity of the development challenges facing Asia and the Pacific, collaboration is essential to build on each other's strengths, and to create a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts.
Institutional collaboration is also fundamental for addressing the challenge of meeting the Millennium Development Goals, the international community's agreed targets for improving global living conditions by 2015. The complex and inter-related issues of poverty, disease, inequality and environmental degradation require partnerships at all levels to strengthen our performance, and to achieve lasting results.
In addition to forging partnerships, building local capacity is key to progress in achieving the development goals. Here in Asia, there is a need for significant capacity development across most of the sectors that are essential to achieving the development goals. Good governance, institutional capacity and political will must be aggressively pursued in all sectors, including health, agriculture, education and environmental protection.
Another factor central to achieving the development goals is adequate financial resources. As we all know, foreign direct investment is now much greater than official development assistance in the developing world, and especially in Asia. However, we must ensure that private capital flows contribute to sustainable and equitable economic growth. We must ensure that the level of official development assistance is adequate to reduce poverty and achieve the development goals.
Many of the necessary elements are coming into place: we see a growing commitment among governments to act, greater levels of corporate responsibility, and new models of partnership as exemplified by the ADB-IUCN relationship.
For Asia and the Pacific, eliminating poverty and protecting the environment will require additional partnerships, innovative approaches, and even greater commitment in the years to come. By working together, we can create a brighter and greater future for all people in Asia and the Pacific, and of the whole world.
Tadao Chino is president of the Asian Development Bank. This article is based on his keynote address at the recent IUCN World Conservation Forum.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath