Taiwan is the 51st state?
Your recent editorial "Taiwan is sovereign but abnormal" (Nov. 11, page 8) left out one element: Taiwan in fact falls under US Military Government authority according to "Taiwan Status: From Grotius to WTO" (www.geocities.com/taiwanstatus/taiwanstatus)
The treaty between Japan and the Republic of China (ROC) was formed under the provision of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, to which the US is the principal signatory. Since Japan recognized the People's Republic of China (PRC) after 1979, the Taipei (Japan-ROC) Treaty became void. Japan and the PRC had another treaty under the provision of the San Francisco Peace Treaty. Before this treaty, there was an agreement among Japan, China and the US when the US had to ask China's help on the Vietnam problem. What followed was China asking for Taiwan's return (which required Japan's kowtow), and Japan asked for the return of Okinawa. So history shows Japan got Okinawa back, the US got the Vietnam problem solved, and in public China got the Three Communiques, signed by Washington and Beijing in 1972, 1978 and 1982. There is no doubt that the US made some concession on Taiwan to China, otherwise China would not have kept its insistence on the fulfillment of the Three Communiques.
China can play a lot of cards. For example, the Bush administration changed its tone after the spy-craft incident during the first year of his presidency, and US Secretary of State Colin Powell and Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星) became "good friends." Taiwan has to watch out for being "traded" in the geopolitics of Japan, the Koreas, China and the US. What happened during Powell's "slip of the tongue," the recent agreement of China, and the US on the North Korea question both point to one agenda.
There are signs that this event is very similar to the Vietnam problem in the 1970s. After the North Korea question is solved, there will be some changes regarding Taiwan's status as far as the Bush administration is concerned. Unless Taiwan wants to become the 51st state of the US, it cannot depend on assistance.
Overseas Taiwanese organizations have to be recruited to help prevent a status change. At least these organizations have to expand their agenda to include the Americans and British to put pressure on their representatives in the US Congress so that the Bush administration will not give Taiwan to China.
Rao Kok-sia
Charlestown,
Massachusetts
Taipei isn't Beijing
If Tongyong pinyin were a "nuisance" ("The perfect romanization system," Nov. 20, page 8), Hanyu pinyin would be worse, because most people need a phrase book to adapt to its "q" and "x." Without such a book, people will be at a loss. They will wonder, for example, whether "qing" should be pronounced as "king" or "quing" or something else; and whether "xi" should be pronounced as "zi" or "eksi" or "si."
By replacing "q" and "x" in Hanyu by "c" and "s" in Tongyong, people can read "cing" and "si" in the previous examples more easily and accurately. Tongyong is for the great majority of people who do not have any background in Hanyu, nor any reference books about Mandarin romanization.
It is inappropriate to claim Hanyu (literally meaning "Han language") is a "standard." After all, the Han is only one of the major ethnic groups in China. There is no such thing as standard English, French or Spanish. Why should there be standard Chinese?
People accept and appreciate the difference between US English and British English and the difference between traditional and simplified Chinese characters. Taiwan has decided to adopt Tongyong. Why are we still arguing about whether Taiwan should use Tongyong or Hanyu?
While in Rome, do what the Romans do. In Taiwan, let's use Tongyong romanization. Please do not treat Taipei as Beijing.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath