US National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice's 500m move from the White House to the State Department is a supreme act of vindication by a president who believes he has the popular will behind him.
Under Secretary of State Colin Powell, the State Department has been the lone unruly province in President George W. Bush's kingdom, paying dutiful lip service to his authority while whispering multilateralist sedition.
Restored with a clear majority vote, Bush has dealt with the nagging problem in imperious fashion, dispatching a courtier so close to him as to be almost Bush royalty.
Rice, who turned 50 on Sunday, has been tutoring him on foreign policy since 1998. She quickly emerged as the leader of the self-styled "Vulcans" who met at the Bush ranch in Crawford, Texas, to craft a conservative strategy for the world, and it was clear that the then Texas governor had taken a shine to the elegant academic who shared his obsession with sports.
"She's fun to be with," Bush said at the time. "I like lighthearted people, not people who take themselves so seriously."
"Besides, she's really smart!" he said.
As national security adviser for four years, Rice has been indispensable and constantly available. She has no other life, has never married and a handful of dates with eligible men organized by well-meaning friends have led nowhere romantically.
She spends many of her weekends at Camp David with the president, watching baseball and football and doing jigsaws with the first family. Her only time off appears to be occasional sessions playing the piano with a classical music group in Washington.
At a dinner party with some senior journalists in spring this year, her dedication was revealed in an extraordinary Freudian slip.
"As I was telling my husb-" she blurted, before correcting herself. "As I was telling President Bush."
It says a lot about the prim reputation of both that hardly anyone in gossip-ridden Washington interpreted the slip as a sign of a romantic connection.
As Bush campaigned for re-election, Rice's colleagues and friends were suggesting that she was longing to get away and get a life of her own. She even mused publicly about becoming the commissioner of the National Football League.
Before the election, a longstanding friend confidently predicted she would go back to academia, unless she got the defense department.
But there was to be no vacancy at the Pentagon.
It is unclear what induced Rice to agree to take a job she privately said she was not keen on, but she is not the sort of person to turn down a direct request from the president. She may also have found it hard to turn down the opportunity to become the first black woman to fill a post that first belonged to Thomas Jefferson.
Nevertheless, the State Department is hardly a natural fit for a woman who has always been more interested in the exercise than the balance of power.
She was born in Birmingham, Alabama, and her early years were spent amid the turmoil of the civil rights battles. A young schoolmate was killed when white supremacists blew up a black church, and her father, a college teacher, had to patrol the streets to protect their middle class neighborhood.
The young Condoleezza (the name derives from the musical term con dolcezza, which means "to play with sweetness") leapt high over every social and racial barrier. She was a prodigy -- a pianist who gave her first recital by the age of four, an accomplished skater and a precocious intellect accepted by the University of Denver to study political science at 15.
It was Josef Korbel, a Czech immigrant and former secretary of state Madeleine Albright's father, who inspired her interest in international politics. She wrote her thesis on the Czech armed forces and became a Sovietologist at Stanford University.
It was Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser to the former president George Bush, who spotted her talent. She became an influential Cold Warrior in the first Bush White House just as the Cold War was ending and the Soviet Union was about to collapse.
She has been faulted, and has faulted herself, for failing to keep up with the pace of change in the Eastern bloc. The first Bush White House clung to the integrity of the Soviet Union almost longer than Moscow itself, and stuck by former president Mikhail Gorbachev even after it became apparent that Boris Yeltsin represented Russia's future.
Her critics say she failed to learn from that mistake, and was still fixated on Russia and China in the first few months of the younger Bush's administration. In his account of that period, her former counter-terrorism expert, Richard Clarke, lambasted her for failing to organize a Cabinet-level meeting on the al-Qaeda threat until September 2001.
On Iraq, Rice played both sides of the argument. She promoted an aggressive line against Baghdad but also gave tacit support for Powell's insistence on taking the issue to the UN.
On the few occasions that she flexed her White House muscle, taking over postwar planning for Iraq from the Pentagon and US policy in the Israel-Palestinian conflict, the results were poor.
Now, the move to the State Department will entail having to take even greater responsibility.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath