Like ink stains, blots of extremist Islamic terror are spreading across Southeast Asia, with southern Thailand as the latest target and with spurs reaching out to Australia and South Korea.
The rise of an Islamic insurgency in Thailand's Kra Isthmus, where a Muslim separatist movement has been simmering for 20 years, has the marks of a classic maneuver by al-Qaeda, the Islamic terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden. He is still at large and broadcast a vitriolic message to Americans just before the US presidential election on Nov. 2.
Al-Qaeda did not start the Muslim insurgency in Thailand, which is overwhelmingly Buddhist, but waited until it was well underway and then may have injected training, weapons, and funds into the movement through its Southeast Asian affiliate, Jemaah Islamiya. "We're watching it closely," said a US official with access to intelligence reports, "and we're hoping to learn more."
Within the last two months, Muslims extremists have repeatedly attacked Thai government offices, police stations, security forces, homes of local officials and village chiefs, and markets. Since the beginning of the year, the insurgents are reported that have killed 360 people.
In response, the Thai police have cracked down, killing 85 rioters in a raid that drew protests from the king of Thailand and the US government for being excessive. That crackdown led, in turn, to revenge bombings by the insurgents and the beheading of a Buddhist village leader.
Further escalation in the violence is expected and no end is in sight even though Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra has vowed to stamp out the insurgency.
The insurgency in southern Thailand has strained relations between Thailand and Malaysia next door. The Thai government has alleged that Malaysia has provided a haven across the border for the Muslim insurgents, who are ethnic Malays. Malaysia has denied that and accused the Thai government of oppressing the Muslims in southern Thailand.
Analysts have noted that Al-Jazeera, the Islamic radio and TV network based in the Persian Gulf state of Qatar, has played up the Thai insurgency, suggesting growing links with other Islamic terrorist networks.
Meanwhile, Australian intelligence agencies have identified Muslims who were trained by al-Qaeda in Afghanistan before assaults on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington on Sept. 11, 2001. Australia is home to about 340,000 Muslims, a third native-born, who comprise 4 percent of the population.
Far to the north, al-Qaeda has threatened terrorist actions in South Korea in response to the dispatch of 3,600 South Korean soldiers to Iraq alongside US and other coalition troops there. At least two such threats have been posted in recent weeks and a potential target would be US forces stationed there. About 500,000 Muslims live in South Korea.
Islamic extremist networks in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and wherever else they operate are said not to be aligned in a tightly-knit, hierarchical organization but rather to be loosely affiliated with one another as they draw financial and logistic support from al-Qaeda.
In Southeast Asia, the leading unit within this network is Jemaah Islamiya, which numbers anywhere from several hundred activists to five thousand members. Formed in the late 1990s, its avowed goal is to establish an Islamic state that would include Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, southern Thailand and the southern Philippines.
While Muslim terrorist cells are believed to exist in Malaysia, the Malaysian Special Branch of counter-terrorist operatives is said to have drawn on the experience of their predecessors who defeated Chinese guerrillas in the 1960s to keep potential terrorists at bay.
The government of Singapore, which is home to citizens of Chinese, Malay, Tamil Indian and European ancestry, is especially nervous about being swamped in a Muslim sea. That underlies the frequent plea from Singaporean leaders to the Americans: "Stick around, don't go home." Singapore has been quietly supportive of the US war on terror.
Jemaah Islamiya, sometimes known by its initials JI, was responsible for the bombing in Bali, the Indonesian island, in October 2002, and is still active there despite the capture of its leader, Riduan Issamudin, usually called Hambali, in Thailand in August last year.
Moreover, the government in the Philippines has been unable to make progress against Muslim insurgents known as Abu Sayyaf in its southern islands. It has seized several foreign tourists and held them for ransom as a way to fund its operations.
Richard Halloran is a journalist based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing