Ivory Coast in West Africa has not been blessed with sagacious leadership. Its first president, Felix Houphouet-Boigny, ruled for thirty-three years. So egotistic was he that during all that time, he never installed a vice-president. So when his fantasies of immortality were shattered in 1993, his Parti Democratique de Cote d'iVoire (PDCI) immediately disintegrated into ethnic factions, with politics in the Ivory Coast going downhill ever since.
However, responsibility for the civil war now raging there rests squarely on the shoulders of the current president, Laurent Gbagbo.
For before Gbagbo assumed power in October 2000, the country's ethnic fault-line had been widely exposed and it was up to Gbagbo to tread in a careful manner. Instead, he drove a coach and horses into rift, triggering the political earthquake that now threatens to destroy the country.
Gbagbo shares a good deal with his predecessors. Houphpouet-Boigny was succeeded in 1993 by the president of the National Assembly, Henri-Konan Bedie. Bedie, like Houphouet-Boigny, was a southerner, and he ignored the fear of northerners that the south was dominating them by barring the prime minister, Alassane Ouattara, a northerner, from the contest to succeed Houphouet. He claimed that Ouattara was not an Ivorian at all but a national of neighboring Burkina Faso.
This astonished northerners, who asked: "Where was Bedie when Ouattara was exercising the highest functions of government as prime minister? If Ouattara was fit to be prime minister, how can he not be fit for president?"
These were dangerous questions, for apart from being a northerner, Ouattara is also a Muslim, which makes him the favorite candidate of the country's largest single bloc of voters. Worse, by depriving Ouattara of his nationality, Bedie had signaled that most northerners could just as easily be robbed of their nationality. This would subject them to harassment by the police and the possible loss of their property.
Having prevented Ouattara from running against him, Bedie won the presidency. But within six years, his nemesis had caught up with him.
On Christmas Eve 1999, a military faction believed to be sympathetic to Ouattara, seized power and sent Bedie into exile.
To mask their northern sympathies, the soldiers chose a southerner, General Robert Guei, to be their leader. But unknown to them, Guei had his own personal ambitions. After he had consolidated power into his own hands, he dismissed the two most important northerners in his junta and accused them of plotting against him. He then declared himself a candidate for the election through which, he said, the county would be handed over to a democratically-elected government.
To achieve his objectives, Guei resurrected Bedie's claim that Ouattara was a foreigner. So, once again, Ouattara, was barred from contesting the country's top job.
But even with Ouattara excluded, Guei could not win the election, despite his best efforts, and the followers of the candidate who did win -- another southern-er, Laurent Gbagbo -- took to the streets and chased Guei out of power.
Having triumphed, by popular will, against Guei, Gbagbo has not, however, worked to unite the nation. Instead, he has embraced the concept whereby "full Ivorian nationality" or "Ivoirite" is required for certain jobs, which had been enunciated by both Bedie and Guei.
Once again, the object of the ethnic chauvinism was Ouattara. Gbagbo's party in fact turned the concept of Ivoirite into some sort of national crusade. It frightened northerners, and it came as no surprise when, in September 2002, soldiers from the northern part of the country mutinied and succeeded in cutting the country in two.
They have occupied the city of Bouake as their capital ever since.
French troops, aided by troops from the West African Economic Community (ECOWAS) and the UN, intervened to separate the north, held by rebels who call themselves the "New Forces" and the south, which is under Gbagbo's troops.
International concern led to the two sides attending a conference in Marcoussis, France, in January last year, at which an agreement was signed by the two sides to work together in a national unity government.
But it soon became apparent that Gbagbo had only used the agreement and those after it, to buy time. Early this month, he ignored the truce and attacked the "rebels" in the north from the air. His air force also made the mistake of bombing a French position and killing nine French soldiers. France retaliated by destroying practically the whole of the Ivory Coast air force.
This in turn sparked anti-French rioting in the south of the country.
An uneasy stalemate now rules in the country and South Africa President Thabo Mbeki has been designated by the African Union to try and bring the combatants to the table, once again. But the omens are not good.
Until the Ivory Coast's political leadership begins to genuinely understand that in a multi-ethnic country, power must be shared, all agreements to bring peace to the country are written in sand.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath