Defeated vice-presidential candidates in America usually don't get much attention but Senator John Edwards signaled, perhaps inadvertently, what lies immediately ahead in US politics when he said on Wednesday: "This fight has just begun."
In brief but feisty remarks before Senator John Kerry, delivered his speech conceding the election to President George W. Bush, Edwards struck a combative tone that differed from the ritual platitudes appealing for unity that came from both Kerry and Bush. For one stark fact stands out despite the solid victory of Bush in the electoral college, the popular vote, and the Republican increase in its hold on the Congress: America is as divided as it has not been since the turbulent Vietnam era 40 years ago. That split will affect most decisions in domestic politics and foreign policy, including that toward Asia, for the next four years.
The division was especially vivid in the colored charts the television networks displayed to portray the cumulative results of the close election: The northeast and the west coast were Democratic blue while the heartland in middle America was almost completely Republican red.
Deep down in America today is a cultural canyon between the religious right and the secular left. A nearly unanimous conclusion drawn by political pundits once the results were known was that this election had been decided more on values than anything else, including economic issues.
On one side are the conservatives who cherish the traditional values of family, marriage, church, individual responsibility, the sanctity of life, and national security. On the other side are liberals who advocate abortion rights, homosexual marriage, a strong government social and economic role, and international relations based on alliances and the UN.
In addition is a widening political split, the Democratic coalition assembled by president Franklin Roosevelt in the Depression years of the 1930s is crumbling as its leaders pass from the scene. In contrast, the Republican coalition forged by president Ronald Reagan in the 1980s has taken hold across the land.
Personalities in politics are never to be underestimated. For four years, liberals have been outspoken in their dislike, even hatred, of Bush and that may have drawn a conservative backlash. The liberal disdain, however, is matched by the intensity of the conservative contempt for former president Bill Clinton, which may have generated a similar backlash.
Another divisive point: The campaign just concluded was the nastiest, least civil in the last 50 years. The mud-slinging, name-calling, false advertising and scandal mongering on both sides and at every level from the presidential races down to local legislative contests is not likely to be forgotten even after gracious speeches urging support for common causes.
US policy in Asia did not figure in the election campaign outside of debate on how to cope with North Korea's aspiration to acquire nuclear arms. That does not mean that Bush will have a free hand as he begins his second term; Senator Kerry retains his seat in Congress, giving him a platform from which to lead criticism and opposition to the president. Edwards, however, did not run for re-election to the Senate.
If Bush so chooses, he will have a venue from which to launch his second term's Asia policy when he attends the APEC forum in Chile later this month. Surely the 21 Asian leaders gathered there will be looking for an exposition of his ideas for the next four years.
At the top of the president's agenda should be his vision for relations with China, an emerging political, economic, and military power. In his first term, the president vacillated on the central issue between the US and China, which is the fate of the island of Taiwan.
At first the president was firm in asserting that the US would stand by Taiwan, then shifted to what Beijing saw as a pro-Chinese stance. More recently, Secretary of State Colin Powell, during a trip to Japan, China, and South Korea, appeared to support Beijing's claims to Taiwan in contrast to his earlier praise for Taiwan's democracy and support for its self-determination.
Bush is a politician who rewards his friends and rebukes those he considers to be critics. Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi can expect a warm reception. Leaders of those nations that openly expressed a preference for Kerry in the election -- like South Korea and France -- may find the temperature chilly.
Richard Halloran is a journalist based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath