On Oct. 28, the People's Bank of China announced it would raise the one-year interest rate by 0.27 percent to 5.58 percent from 5.31 percent -- the first rate hike in over nine years. Why did China raise its interest rate? Will it continue to raise the rate? Will this affect the yuan's exchange rate?
Basically, there are three reasons behind the rate hike. First, the speedy growth in "investment in fixed assets" that has overheated China's economy has not been completely reined in, showing that Beijing's macroeconomic control measures have not yet cooled down the overheated economic growth. Total investment in fixed assets grew by 26.7 percent last year, and by 43.5 percent to its highest peak in March, causing much concern about the economy. After Beijing officially launched its new control measures in April, investment still grew by 30.3 percent in the first eight months.
Second, inflation pressure is still high. China's inflation rate jumped 4.2 percent points within a year -- hitting 5.3 percent in July and August, from only 1.1 percent last September. Although the Chinese government claims that higher food prices, which trigger inflation, will decline after the abundant autumn harvest, no major price drop has yet been seen. On the contrary, growth in prices for non-food items gradually increased to 1 percent in August from 0.1 percent in January, as China's overall price levels remain high.
Moreover, as international oil prices move above US$50 a barrel, this has caused prices of Chinese commodities to climb. Viewing the latest figure in August, Chinese commodity prices grew were up 6.8 to 12.9 percent from the same period last year.
Third, people's savings have continuously dropped, decreasing banks' liquid funds and increasing financial risk. Due to inflation, seen since last October, the actual one-year deposit rate has become negative, sinking to minus 3.72 percent in August. As a result of the negative figure, growth in deposits has slipped month by month, and savings grew by a mere 15.3 percent in August, which was 4.7 percent lower than the rate in August of last year, marking seven months of consecutive decline.
Between June and September, the US raised its interest rate three times, or a total of 0.75 percent, providing a good external environment for China's rate hike. Still, the 0.27-percent hike may not resolve the cause of the overheated economy: massive foreign exchange that is flooding into China's market due to its low exchange rate.
Since last year, the People's Bank of China has been forced to absorb more than US$10 billion of foreign exchange every month to maintain the fixed exchange rate. The amount in July was still as high as US$12.4 billion. This phenomenon has seriously interfered with the autonomy of China's currency policy.
Additionally, China's "unidentified" foreign exchange reached US$50.3 billion in late August, which was US$17.6 billion, or 53.8 percent, higher than that of the same period last year. Rampant "hot money" in China may become even worse this year.
The 0.27-percent hike was indeed insignificant. It does little to relieve inflation pressure, not to mention that investors may expect more rate hikes in the future. Such expectations will bring more money into China's market, and will increase appreciation pressure on the yuan.
So the rate hike can hardly cool down the overheated economy. It will lead to greater expectation for the yuan's appreciation, and even more foreign exchange will flow into the market, overheating the economy while causing a new wave of pressure for more interest rate hikes.
Tung Chen-yuan is an associate research fellow at the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath