To allay China's fury over his private trip to Taiwan this summer before becoming Singapore's prime minister, Lee Hsien Loong (
This diplomatic blow occurred at roughly the same time that Taiwan was failing -- for the 13th time -- in its bid to re-enter the UN, having withdrawn when China was admitted in 1971. When Taiwanese athletes competed in the recent Athens Olympics, advertisements supporting the team were removed. Returning home from a trip to three Central American allies, Premier Yu Shyi-kun's entourage was forced to transit in Okinawa to escape the effects of Typhoon Aere, inciting a protest from China against Japan's government.
Such symbolic politics forms a key part of the mainland's relentless effort to isolate Taiwan internationally. To display its displeasure at Lee Hsien Loong's visit, China's government warned Singapore that a bilateral free-trade deal might be in jeopardy. Commenting on Taiwan's UN application, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Kong Quan (孔泉) demanded that Taipei stop pursuing its "two Chinas" policy.
China's diplomatic offensive against Taiwan escalated in early August, when President Hu Jintao (
As a result of such pressure, Taiwan has become the most isolated country in modern history. This is all the more glaring in view of its economic and political success. Indeed, that anomaly, if not rectified, is increasingly dangerous.
Frustrated by a lack of recognition, popular disgust in Taiwan with terms like "China" and "Chinese" is rising. So is support for distinct countries on each side of the Taiwan Strait.
Although opinion polls indicate that a majority still supports the status quo, many are beginning to believe that if the country's official name, the Republic of China, is not acceptable to the international community, then another name might be.
Millions of people took to the streets during the presidential election last March to demand a name change.
The latest source of contention -- both on the domestic front and in relations with China -- concerns whether to write a new constitution. Enacted in Nanjing before the Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government resettled in Taipei after the Chinese Civil War of the 1940s, Taiwan's Constitution is considered by some an anachronism, unfit for a democracy with a population of more than 23 million.
Within Taiwan, the debate over constitutional reform has led to disturbing developments. Most worrying, it has heightened tensions between Taiwan's various ethnic groups over national identity and relations with China.
Of course, Taiwan's strained relations with China have suffered further as a result, with China's government denouncing calls for a new constitution as a calculated move towards independence. China's Taiwan Affairs Office issued a warning on the eve of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Alarmed by a potential conflict between the two archrivals, the Bush administration urged Chen, who won a second term in March, to exercise restraint. Consequently, in his inauguration speech on May 20, Chen promised to amend the constitution via the current mechanism, rather than adopting an entirely new constitution via referendum.
But the passage of recent constitutional reforms by the Legislative Yuan illustrates the continuing volatility of the situation. In addition to replacing the multi-member-district, single-vote electoral system with a single-member-district, two-vote system, the amendment reduces the number of seats in the legislature by half.
The reforms have been lauded as a crucial step towards a more stable two-party system. Similarly, a higher electoral threshold for winning seats should counter vote buying by candidates.
For China, however, the reforms are a smoke screen by Taiwan's government. China fears that the government still wants to write a new constitution -- one from which Taiwanese independence would be derived. This senseless political warfare has hampered cross-strait economic relations. Bilateral trade turnover reached US$50 billion last year, and Taiwanese took almost 4 million trips to China. It is imperative for both economies that direct transport links be established immediately.
But, here, too, political sensitivities loom large. China wants the link defined as domestic in nature, with rights reserved exclusively to airlines registered on either side, while Taiwan insists that services be open to foreign competition.
Thus does the fight over sovereignty overshadow all bilateral issues. Indeed, with China bent on unification, it refuses even to define relations with Taiwan as "bilateral," while China's growing global influence suggests that Taiwan's diplomatic fortunes are not about to improve.
That, however, may merely strengthen support in Taiwan for independence as the only way out.
Chien-min Chao is professor of politics at National Chengchi University. He writes extensively on subjects concerning cross-strait relations and Chinese politics.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath