All of the world's current crises -- conflict, HIV/AIDS, unemployment -- have one thing in common: they all involve young people who are burdened by the despair of these problems, but who are also a largely untapped source of change.
To many of us, the world may seem like an old place. Yet there are 2.8 billion people under the age of 25 out of a world population of 6 billion. Nine out of 10 of these young people live in developing countries. They are not just the future, but also the present.
That is why 170 youth leaders from 82 countries are gathering this week in Sarajevo, at the invitation of the World Bank, the European Youth Forum, and the Scout Movement. This is not just another meeting, it is a gathering of a group that is most at risk, and one that is key to meeting the world's development challenges.
Consider HIV/AIDS: of the 40 million people living with HIV/AIDS, more than a quarter are in their youth. There are 121 million children of primary school age who are not in school, and more than half of these are girls -- most of whom will never learn to read or write.
Similarly, youth are becoming involved in conflicts around the world with alarming frequency, either as victims or, just as tragically, as soldiers. More than half of those who are of working age are jobless, according to a new International Labor Organization report. Lack of jobs can lead to increased frustration and hopelessness on such a scale that the ensuing social and political ferment could make tomorrow's world far less stable and secure than that of today.
One thing is certain: old solutions to old problems won't work. Greater effort, in the form of research and resources, must be invested in better understanding the hopes and aspirations of young people. After all, they are living in deeply confusing times.
Young people today are more exposed to the rest of the world as a result of globalization. But most do not have access to it. They are part of a strange paradox, one that is ubiquitous in the developing world: in villages in Africa, young people can buy Coca-Cola, but they have no clean water. In small towns in Asia, youth enjoy Internet access and the world is at their fingertips. Yet visa regimes will not allow them to travel very far.
While we must address these imbalances of globalization, we must also take advantage of the opportunities it presents. There is a universal sensibility that more and more young people share, thanks to the Internet, music and culture. We need to find ways to harness this in order to let young people be conduits for peace and harmony.
The Sarajevo conference is a step in the right direction. The conference deals with education, conflict prevention and resolution, risky behavior and youth employment. The young representatives understand that these issues are manifestly interlinked. Greater awareness of their shared problems should bring greater activism toward developing programs that meet the needs of youth.
The concerns of today's young people are heartfelt and urgent. In the next 25 years, 2 billion more people entering our planet will live in the developing world. We must set our priorities around their need for more opportunities, jobs and social justice.
James Wolfensohn is president of the World Bank Group, Eduardo Missoni is secretary general of the World Organization of the Scout Movement and Giacomo Filibeck is president of the European Youth Forum.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing