`UNfair' ads are spot-on
I usually concur with Vice President Annette Lu (
that are now appearing in New
York City a little off the mark ("Annette Lu says New Yorkers can't understand ads," Sept. 1, page 3).
I arrived back in Taiwan from Bangkok after a month away, and saw the ad from a bus window. It immediately cut through the clutter and seized my attention. I only had four or five seconds and the ad's full meaning regarding the injustice of Taiwan's continued exclusion from the UN hit me very powerfully. It's a superb piece of issues-oriented advertising. I used to teach a university course on the semiotics of modern advertising and I wouldn't be surprised if this one wins awards. The black "UN" script stands out, you immediately think "United Nations," then the "fair," in another color, leads you to read "unfair," which is precisely the point that needs to be made.
The other ad, which I saw
in the paper, calls attention to
the usual conflation of Taiwan
with China in the world today,
consistent with the People's Republic of China's "one China" dogma. The ad questions
this by placing the words "Authoritarian China" against
a red background above the words "Democratic Taiwan" against a green background; between the two fields is a does-not-equal symbol. This
arrangement of text is quite
effective.
Democratic states need to begin questioning UN practices. The flagrant injustice of the UN's exclusion of Taiwan should be addressed. The UN should also be taken to task on other issues: its scapegoating of Israel, its willingness to turn away from African genocides, its collusion with the former Iraqi regime in the oil-for-food scam. The list goes on and on.
I don't believe the ads engage in UN-bashing. They draw much-needed attention
to how the UN is being compromised and misused by
certain states.
I applaud these ads and their message.
Stephen Carter
Taichung
The "UNfair" ads in New York are plenty clear to anyone with a decent grasp of US ad practices. As a five-year resident of New York, I cannot imagine anyone here reading these ads and being confused about their point.
Moreover, as a long-term American supporter of Taiwan, I believe it is urgent that steps be taken now to bring the Taiwan issue to the front of Americans' consciousness. With both political parties cozying up to Beijing in their actions, if not in their words, Taiwan must do something now to make sure every American knows about the issue of Taiwan's freedom. It will be too late to convince the American people to support Taiwan after the People's Liberation Army takes the streets of Taipei.
Jeff Soules
New York
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath