One of the surest ways of testing a country's political temperature is to look at the national bestseller list. The current No. 1 on Amazon's chart, Unfit for Command, in which "Swift Boat veterans speak out against John Kerry," will draw attention elsewhere.
Formerly No. 1, and currently holding on at No. 3 among the mega-sellers, The American Prophecies, will probably not. It should.
The author, Michael Evans, is part preacher, would-be soothsayer, big-time blowhard. He's also rich, given his book's runaway sales. Not that money is a main motive, any more than it was for Moses.
The book purports to reveal how "ancient prophecies reveal our nation's future." More precisely, these prophecies -- correctly decoded -- confirm that US President George W. Bush's tearing up of the Middle East road map in April has found great favor with God.
The current conflict accords exactly, for those that have eyes to see, or who need teachers like the Reverend Evans to instruct them, with the divinely ordained script for the US and Israel.
We are now, as Evans puts it, "in the eye of the prophetic storm." Bracing, perilous, but for the American faithful, deeply reassuring.
Much of The American Prophecies concerns itself with close exegesis of the page of the Bible on which incoming presidents have laid their hand while taking the oath of office during the swearing-in ceremony.
It is a presidential privilege to choose the passage. What did the 42nd president (known to the irreverent as Slick Willy) select for that fateful day?
Galatians 6:8: "For he that soweth unto his own flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption."
Prophetic or what?
More damning, however, than his fleshly reapings with Monica, was Bill Clinton's betraying the sacred mission entrusted him by God. He cannot plead ignorance when his time comes to stand before the divine bench. As governor of Arkansas, he was specifically instructed by his pastor, the Reverend W.O. Vaught, "You might be president one day. You will make mistakes and God will forgive you. But God will never forgive you if you turn your back on Israel."
Which, to the great peril of his country, Clinton did, at Camp David in July 2000. What followed, 14 months later in Manhattan, was a mark of God's stern displeasure at the errant president.
Evans' exegesis demonstrates to his satisfaction and that of millions of his countrymen, apparently, that the US, no less than Israel, is centrally alluded to in biblical prophecy. Under un-Godly presidents -- notably Carter, Clinton and the Bush I -- the US has dallied with its false marriage partner Ishmael/Islam, foregoing religious principle for oil. Now, under Bush II, it is cleaving to its true partner, Isaac/Israel.
It is clear to Evans' prophetic mind that "America must go to war against Syria,
a much more dangerous terrorist-harboring state than Iraq" and that "Israel must go into Iran and take out their nuclear reactor." God wants these acts of war. Not to comply would induce Him to lift His "hedge of protection" and permit a "much, much worse" consequence than Sept. 11.
For Evans, "God is foreign policy." And there is only one item on the agenda: stand by Israel, crush her foes.
The American Prophecies would not matter were it not that, one, so many Americans are reading it, and two, Bush is wooing the Christian right as core voters for his re-election. How far will he go to keep them on board if he gets his second term? Will he have the good sense to use them and dump them?
Thoughtful Israelis must also have mixed feelings about Evans and his co-religionists. The latter's support for the state of Israel is unswerving -- but with the awkward proviso of a mass conversion to Christianity by the Jews after the "final battle in prophecy."
With friends like Michael Evans, they may think, who needs Yasser Arafat?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath