After China's football team lost 3-1 to the potent Japanese in the Asian Cup heartbreaker, Chinese nationalism once again reared its ugly head. Outraged fans protested outside the stadium, burning Japanese flags and pelting the Japanese team bus with bottles.
For Taiwanese people, these despicable scenes are awfully familiar. They are reminiscent of the protesters at Ketagalan Boulevard after the presidential election.
They have several things in common: For one thing, both groups were unable to accept the outcome of the respective contests. For any contender, accepting failure is pretty much the most basic, decent thing to do. Besides the ethical issue, Chinese fans sent a strong, disrespectful message to Taiwan that China is just simply too invincible, too powerful to ignore. It creates an "obey-me-or-die" impression. When it comes to the sensitive issue of cross-strait unification, the problem with China is that it always plays the self-regarding, petulant child. It never seems to grow up and stop discriminating against Taiwanese values.
On the other hand, Taiwanese society has evolved into a democracy, and no nationalism or populism can top that. In short, people's will comes first when it comes to cross-strait issues.
Threatening and blackmailing don't make for a good relationship, and this sort of behavior only scares away the Taiwanese.
While Beijing learns to improve its communication skills, our media also have much work to do. Since journalism is about objectivity and fairness, our journalists should expose more information about China, both positive and negative.
Since China is so desperate to unite with us, shouldn't we know more about it?
For instance, our journalists can interview some of the fans that burned the Japanese flag and get to know the real reasons for their anger.
But the local media have not been doing that. The fourth estate (the media) has been disregarded and undermined.
The cross-strait relationship is about communication, and good journalism -- rather than an information blackout -- is the key to better communication.
Burning flags and blackmailing other nations are extreme actions, and such things should be carefully examined and widely reported. Here is a word of advice to our press: "China is not a bed of roses, so don't act like it is."
Iap Hong Sum
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath