Singaporean Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (
Besides paying a visit to President Chen Shui-bian 陳水扁 at the Presidential Office, he also attended a dinner banquet hosted by the president at the Presidential Residence and visited other government officials as well as American Institute in Taiwan director Douglas Paal.
Lee left Taipei last Tuesday and returned to Singapore. His visit to Taiwan received much media attention here. Chen and Lee reportedly had a very pleasant meeting, during which the two discussed a host of issues related to relationship between Taiwan and Singapore, including enhancement of bilateral cooperation, trade, the future development of Southeast Asia and peace and stability in the cross-strait relationship.
While Lee's visit was unofficial, and thus, the contents of his discussions with Chen were not revealed, a visit from the future leader of Singapore was enough to highlight the solidarity between Taiwan and Singapore.
Despite strong protest by Beijing, Lee was determined to come to Taiwan, which makes the visit that much more significant.
Lee came to this country and met its leaders out of consideration for Singapore's national interests and other issues concerning his power succession.
To Lee, cross-strait tension and polarization may not only endanger peace and stability in Asia, it will also impact the national security of Singapore. Lee came to Taiwan right after his visit to Bei-jing two months ago. Regardless of whether he was here as a messenger of Beijing, the visit shows how much Singapore cares about the cross-strait situation. Many people describe the future leader of Singapore's visit to Beijing, then to Taipei, as a "trip of enlightenment."
Lee will necessarily have to seek an appropriate strategic role in the ever-changing and unpredictable international power structure and the increasingly tense cross-strait situation.
This will enhance Singapore's position in Asia. Lee's trip to either side of the Taiwan Strait was an attempt to understand the views of its leaders in preparation to succeed his father, Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew (李光耀).
It remains to be seen whether Lee came to Taiwan in the role of cross-strait arbitrator or merely a messenger of Beijing. If he does act as an arbitrator, he will be following the path of his father, who traveled back and forth between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, establishing friendships with leaders on both sides, finally ushering in the 1993 meeting in Singapore between officials from the the Straits Exchange Foundation and the PRC's Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait.
But Lee will have to leverage his diplomacy and play an active role in establishing security and peace -- not to mention maximizing the interests of Singapore.
The main purpose of Lee's trip to Beijing and his recent visit to Taipei was to understand his friends and foes in order to maintain Singapore as an active player in Asia. His diplomatic visits thus far have shown his wisdom. By understanding the cross-strait situation, Lee can offer assistance in bargaining while at the same safeguard the interests of Singapore without being drawn too far into cross-strait issues. Chen would do well to learn from such wisdom, as Taiwan is also a small country in the Asia-Pacific region.
Lee's grasp of the positions of Beijing and Taipei should help him maneuver in the international arena. However, it must also be pointed out that as the situation in the Taiwan Strait deteriorates, this country is not to be blamed. Rather, China will be pointed out as the antagonistic one. Beijing's stubbornness is where the instability lies. Lee should not completely embrace his father's diplomatic path of focusing more on a relationship with China over Taiwan. After all, the cross-strait relationship is no longer what it used to be.
If Lee understands how much both the ruling and opposition camps here hope for cross-strait peace and can convey that message to Beijing, perhaps much of the tension in cross-strait relations can be eased.
This should be a central feature of Lee's diplomatic policy. However, if he continues his father's way of giving priority to a relationship with China over Taiwan, then it will be difficult for him to help resolve the current impasse in the Taiwan Strait.
Credit must be given to Lee's trip to Taiwan despite repeated protests from China. He also must be commended for raising the possibility of signing of a free-trade agreement with Taiwan.
In addition to preparing Lee for his power succession, his trip demonstrated the deep friendship between Singapore and Taiwan.
While there is no formal diplomatic relationship between the two nations, continued dialogue and diplomatic exchanges will make relations stronger.
From another perspective, Lee's trip to Taiwan is also the result of the governing Democratic Progressive Party's undying efforts to expand foreign relationships and increase the nation's position in the international community.
Taiwan is gradually moving its focus away from the West to the South Pacific with regard to trade and economic exchanges. Lee may have indeed paved the way for Taiwan to "head south" in a more ambitious fashion, which would benefit the nation's economic relations with not only Singapore, but also the entire region.
At the very least, this relationship will decrease Taiwan's excessive economic dependence on China.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath