Let's face it, everybody screws up, especially when it comes to politics. But the difference for politicians is that their screw-ups wind up on the front pages of newspapers. The "good" politicians develop an ability to recover from a foul-up. By doing so, even if you screw up, you take responsibility and thereby demonstrate that you are responsible and perhaps smart and politically correct. That's exactly the dilemma Vice President Annette Lu (
As one of the most outspoken political figures in Taiwan, Lu's recent words and deeds illustrated a lack of prudence and comprehension on what role a vice president should play in Taiwan's unique political environment.
Constitutionally speaking, a vice president plays no significant role in the government. But during her first term as vice president, Lu has not only deconstructed the stereotype of the VP as "the one with no voice" but also redefined her role as an active player in the administration.
As a long-time advocate for human and women's rights, Lu is well known for her strong and outspoken personality. Her successful re-election, with a strong endorsement from President Chen Shui-bian (
Nevertheless, her latest inappropriate statements on changing the title of the country, as well as her criticism of the government's disaster relief efforts, created the impression that she is not part of the administration. Even worse are her comments about Aboriginal people. While she put all the blame on local media for misrepresenting her ideas about relocating Aboriginals to Taiwan's allies in Central America and about whether the Aboriginal people indeed are native-born Taiwanese, the problem lies in the timing of such messages.
First, reconstruction after Tropical Storm Mindulle is the administration's top priority. Any discussion of future environmental protection and resource allocation should wait. Although Lu might have her own opinion about reconstruction, no prior consultation was made within the administration's decision-making mechanism before she unleashed her "personal comments" on key issues. The results were inconsistency and an apparent lack of internal discipline from the Chen administration.
Moreover, Lu's attempted political maneuvering over key issues revealed her intention to move to a higher level in 2008 -- at least, that is how her actions were interpreted. While claiming that her latest moves have nothing to do with the election in 2008, Lu's sometimes eccentric performance may constitute a huge liability to her own popularity.
Lu is one of the DPP's leading candidates to become the next president, along with Premier Yu Shyi-kun, Kaohsiung Mayor Frank Hsieh (
How should Lu recover from her past screw-ups? She must realize that she is a member of the DPP team. And she has to make sure her role is helpful to Chen. Lu should play the same tune as the DPP government, instead of dancing to her own music.
Compared with her predecessors, Lu enjoys more leeway in terms of exercising political influence. Chen assigned her as the head of two advisory boards: the Science and Technology Task Force and the Human Rights Task Force. Lu has rarely been treated as an outsider to Chen's inner circle.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath