Typhoon Mindulle has brought an unbelievable disaster to central and southern Taiwan since Friday. Some aspects of the disaster are severe enough to be comparable to the tragic consequences of the 921 Earthquake five years ago. Nothing is more urgent than rescue work at the moment. We urge the central government to immediately relocate the rescue effort's headquarters to central Taiwan to carry out more effective disaster relief.
Major flooding, caused by the torrential rains brought by the typhoon, is in fact a result of an accumulation of long-term problems: deforestation, illegal or excessive land use and improper river management. Also, the deteriorating quality of mountain soil as a result of earthquakes makes Taiwan vulnerable to severe flooding.
Ever since President Chen Shui-bian (
There are several weaknesses in the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) disaster response and relief mechanism when it is confronted with a natural disaster with record-breaking precipitation. Many high-ranking government officials reside in the least typhoon-affected city, Taipei, which had only a few evening showers during a warm weekend, and saw hardly a trace of the typhoon. Plus, the emergency reporting system between the central and local governments failed to work properly and government officials therefore misjudged the scale of the disaster in central and southern Taiwan.
As a result, government agencies have once again lagged far behind non-government religious and charity groups in relief and rescue work. Meanwhile, our leaders are not aware of the disaster situation, and cannot determine the order of priorities. For example, Premier Yu Shyi-kun, who controls the most government resources, surprisingly visited Chiayi and Hualien Counties right after the typhoon -- rather than Taichung and Nantou Counties, which were the most seriously affected.
Ironically, Vice President Annette Lu (
According to the Cabinet's Council of Agriculture (COA), it will offer NT$5 billion in emergency loans to farmers and fishermen in disaster areas, at an interest rate of 1.5 percent. In comparison, however, the government has offered NT$280 billion of loans to the Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (
No wonder people condemn the government for favoritism at this very crucial moment. Does the government really have to make money off of people who lost their homes and loved ones?
In light of the government's apparent incompetence, we suggest that all religious and charity groups nationwide, along with disaster relief and rescue organizations, quickly propose concrete relief plans and set up a fund for donations. The fund should be jointly-handled by the government's disaster relief center under appropriate monitoring and management, so as to avoid political interference with, or abuse of, the fund.
The current administration should remember that Taiwan's voters are comparing its performance with its predecessor.
This performance will surely be reflected in the upcoming legislative elections.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath