Since its defeat in the presidential election, the People First Party (PFP) has been trying to crush Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma's supporters are finally rallying around him, while an army of supporters of Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
More time is needed to say whether the "Wang legion" will prevail over Ma. As for his own forces, prominent Ma supporters are nailing their colors to the mast. When Taipei City Government spokesman Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) registered for the KMT legislative primary on Monday, staff at the city government wore badges with a horse logo -- ma (馬) is Chinese for "horse." A day before Wu's registration, Ma pledged at a lunch with members of his team that he would tackle the difficult situation facing people today. The emergence of the "Ma army" is now undeniable.
Meanwhile, attempting to place Ma in the PFP's line of fire, PFP Legislator Liu Wen-hsiung (
If the "Wang legion" prevails, Soong will then come under attack on two fronts. Will the Soong faction then target Wang?
The PFP is still clearly indulging itself in the party-state myth. Unaware of the fact that the election results sounded the death knell for the party-state, the PFP is still harping about a "national disaster" and a "disaster for the party." Their quibbling only shows how out of touch they are with public opinion. One can also say that the blue camp's defeat marks the demise of a foreign regime and the further consolidation of Taiwan's national identity.
A "disaster for the party" is an apt expression. The question is whether the KMT and other blue-camp elements can develop a new understanding of this country and meet the people's needs.
But if they drag the party-state myth along with them, then the PFP won't be the only group to collapse -- the "Ma army" and the "Wang legion" may well consign themselves to oblivion too.
Chin Heng-wei is editor in chief of Contemporary Monthly.
TRANSLATED BY WANG HSIAO-WEN
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing