Pan-blue legislators have accused President Chen Shui-bian's (
Are Chen's comments on the Wu case correct? As far as purpose and result are concerned, he is perfectly correct. He used a former deputy of PFP ChairmanJames Soong's (宋楚瑜) to test the political strength of pan-blue resistance. He not only tested whether the pan-blues had the resolve to resist what they declared to be an illegitimate government, but whether they had the ability to do so.
Put simply, Chen hopes that if the pan-blues can be persuaded to play by the rules and thereby be brought into the political structure, it will be increasingly hard for them to maintain that this structure doesn't rest on a legitimate political foundation. There are many issues more important than that of "the two bullets."
For example, there is the matter of arms purchases. Legislators from both the blue and green camps feel that footing the huge bill for the US weapons might be a waste of money. But what about US pressure? It is not confined to the ruling party, but is felt by pan-blue legislators as well.
Then there is the pension issue. Both camps are under pressure from their supporters, who include both labor and management, to resolve this issue. Solving such problems is practical, substantial and much more helpful to voters.
Even issues relating to various legislators themselves, such as the possible effects of the participation of Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
As for what Chen said, the blue camp should just admit: "Chen got us!" Unfortunately, in terms of practical political interests, this is true. And politically speaking, it allows the debate between the greens and the blues to descend from the heights of bitter acrimony to a routine style of debate.
Chen may well have got the pan-blues on this one, but not so the electorate, the majority of whom are hoping for a return to political normalcy to enable important issues to be dealt with. Nevertheless, a number of recent statements makes one doubt this will happen.
Following the election, Chen probably felt indignant at the accusations, and his supporters were forced to keep quiet in order to avoid confrontations. Consequently, now that things have calmed down, Chen has on several occasions made his feelings known, criticizing pan-blue politicians as well as some members of the public who had doubted him. These sentiments cancel out the soft approach and friendly overtures of before.
Everybody understands that comments on cross-straits issues are sometimes intended for Beijing, sometimes for Washington and sometimes, during elections, for the electorate.
Chen, Chinese Nationalist Party Chairman Lien Chan (
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing