Government officials and civil society representatives from Commonwealth African countries met in Entebbe, Uganda, on May 10 and 11 to discuss the death penalty. We welcomed positive action across Africa to abolish capital punishment. About half of African countries no longer execute convicted prisoners.
There is a clear trend worldwide toward abolition of the death penalty, with an average of three countries a year ending capital punishment. It is unfortunate that Asia and the Middle East are lagging behind the overwhelming majority of European, Latin American and now African countries in this regard.
Of the 78 countries that retain the death penalty, 17 are in this region. China heads the list, executing more people than the rest of the world put together -- and for a range of 68 crimes including tax fraud, avoiding SARS quarantine and killing pandas. Singapore executes the most people per head of population. Vietnam, like China, has chosen to make execution statistics a state secret, and many countries in the region have mandatory death sentences for crimes such as drug smuggling.
The death penalty is a violation of the right to life and is the ultimate cruel, degrading and inhumane punishment. The death penalty has never been shown to deter crime more effectively than other punishments.
On the other hand, many innocent people are known to have been put to death. A jail sentence at least offers the possibility that at some future date cases can be revisited and either confirmed or overturned.
President Muluzi of Malawi and President Mawanawasa of Zambia both made pledges not to sign execution orders while in office. Our leaders could learn from this.
We hope that Asian and Middle Eastern countries as well as the US will consider the example being set by African countries and join the trend to abolish the death penalty.
Luk Po Chu
Hong Kong
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath