Let's make an obvious comparison. In the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Legislator Luo Wen-chia (
On Tuesday afternoon, over 20 members of a KMT unit known as the Chunghsing [rejuvenation] Elite Class called on the party's leadership to concede defeat in the election, give up all stolen assets and relocate its headquarters to southern Taiwan. They also demanded that party leaders at all levels step down to shoulder responsibility for the failure.
They said that, while the KMT and People First Party (PFP) lost the election by merely 29,518 votes, the alliance lost 1.5 million votes from 2000 to this year.
No one from the KMT's leadership, however, dared ask Chairman Lien Chan (
We place no hope in the tired leadership of the party, far removed from public opinion. Yet, we praise the moral courage and the grassroots vision shared by the young KMT members who were brave enough to tell the leadership the truth.
Some KMT politicians do not identify with the route taken in recent years. The sole reason for their staying in the party is the organization's enormous assets, of which they may yet get a share.
Even worse, the party is not aware of its deviation from mainstream public opinion. It still waits idly in its gilded headquarters for others to show their loyalty, a behavior no different from that of the Chinese Communist Party.
Taipei is far from the grassroots in central and southern Taiwan, but longstanding policies have distorted priorities, with disproportionate attention paid to vested interests and privileged groups. Support from the north has been mistaken for national support.
Although southern Taiwan is the center of the nation's agricultural and manufacturing industries, longstanding preference for the north has seen the south sacrificed in terms of economic development. Policies have disregarded southerners, who have been looked down upon as country bumpkins by the urban north, despite the fact that they're also paying the taxes used to build the north. Small wonder that they used their votes to show their expectations of the DPP government.
We are glad to see a group of young KMT members capable of seeing through the smoke surrounding the election and finding the truth and public opinion long concealed by the north. We are glad to see an opposition party that understands Taiwan's mainstream public opinion, and we do not mean the extremist PFP. We hope the KMT will return to a moderate path, deal with its assets problem, listen to the people and return dignity to the south. This would be for the good of Taiwan's democracy.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing