Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Shen Fu-hsiung (
Often, only the powerful may tell the weak to keep quiet. This request is stifling even if made out of love. The Taiwanese people have always been the weak whose mouths were shut through decades of "white terror." Naturally, they can hardly accept Shen's stifling love.
In response to Shen's demand, Wang Ben-hu (汪笨湖) -- a pro-independence call-in show host -- attacked him for defaming the term "love Taiwan." However, he could have better demonstrated the greatness of "loving Taiwan" had he invited more guests to sophisticatedly testify how they love the island -- instead of venting his anger through attacks. Wang's strong criticism was as contradictory as that of Shen, which may further politicize and defame the term "love Taiwan."
Finally, Shen has recently become a hero in the eyes of some of the local printed media. But their praise will only cause him trouble and deepen the misunderstandings among different ethnic groups. The reason is simple: All these media organizations are "pro-unification" in the eyes of the so-called "love Taiwan" groups. They do not like to be labelled like this, and they try to change that image. But they often ex-plode accidentally whenever a big issue crops up.
They certainly know that Shen's suggestion contradicts his goal. For instance, they all point-ed fingers at President Chen Shui-bian (
More importantly, before the election, didn't these media urge the government to establish a commission similar to South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission in an attempt to promote ethnic harmony? How can they praise Shen, whose suggestion may have covered up the truth? His inconsistent words and deeds are irritating, and have even made us distrust him. Similarly, these media actions, whether out of goodwill or not, will be interpreted as arrogant, and cause an even greater antipathy from the ethnic groups that do not trust them. If this continues, how can Taiwan's ethnic problems be resolved?
The uproar's real cause is neither Shen nor his suggestion. The problem lies in the media's lack of professionalism.
Well-functioning media are able to confine the discussion to the matter at issue, leading the whole discussion in a positive direction where a consensus can be reached eventually.
But in Taiwan, we only see the blind compliments or emotional reactions of some media organizations and the reckless counter-attacks of others.
After Shen said on April 19 that he felt like the legendary Wu Feng (
This is indeed the biggest irony relating to the professionalism of Taiwan's media.
Bob Kuo is an information man-agement professor at National Sun Yat-sen University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing