After the triple shocks of Sept. 11, 2001, the war in Iraq and the SARS outbreak, the patterns of tourism around the world shifted last year, according to a new report. The biggest loser was the US. And one of the few winners, unusually, was the Middle East.
Those changes came to light in a report by the World Tourism Organization, a UN agency based in Madrid, which suggested that while the fear of terrorism had deterred some travelers from visiting the US, America's measures against terrorism -- tighter visa and security regulations and heightened security alerts -- had also persuaded many people in the Middle East to vacation in their own region rather than venture farther abroad.
And, the report suggested, those shifts also bred a new kind of traveler, averse to long flights and to journeys planned well in advance, favoring instead cheaper vacations arranged at the last minute -- often over the Internet and not too far from home.
Generalizations can be misleading, and there are many other factors in play. In Europe, the soaring value of the euro against both the US dollar and the British pound has sent some tourists hurrying for their fix of seaside and suntan to non-euro destinations like Turkey's Mediterranean beaches and the Adriatic coast of Croatia.
But that is not the only explanation.
"In 2003, international tourism lived through an exceptionally difficult year in which three negative factors came together: the Iraq conflict, SARS and a persistently weak economy," Francesco Frangialli, the secretary general of the World Tourism Organization, said in a statement.
As a result, the organization's report in late January said: "Tour operators kept facing a difficult environment. Late booking persisted and `do-it-yourself' is consolidating as a means of planning trips, strongly stimulated by the possibilities offered by the Internet."
"Low-cost airlines continued their advance, most notably in Europe," the report said, singling out Britain, where carriers such as Ryanair and EasyJet claim around 30 percent of the overall airline passenger market, compared with 11 percent in 2000.
Over all, the report said, last year was the worst year on record for global tourism as measured in terms of the number of people arriving as vacationers at international destinations. Last year, the total number fell 1.2 percent to 694 million arrivals, a drop of 8.5 million from 2002.
Perhaps the most startling statistic in the report is that, compared with the year 2000, when millennium celebrations produced a spike in tourism worldwide, the biggest single victim of the tourism decline has been the US.
"The big loser in terms of tourism volume is North America," with a 17 percent drop in the number of international visitors arriving for recreational purposes from 91.2 million in 2000 to 76.1 million in last year. The US, the report said, "is still seriously struggling to overcome the impact of Sept. 11 and the subsequent war on terrorism."
The second most affected was Western Europe, down 3 percent from its 2000 peak of 142 million international tourists, because of "the loss of long-haul traffic from the Americas and Asia as well as the weak economy in the region," the report said.
The report included a survey of 180 tourism experts from governments and private businesses in 90 countries, including the US. The consensus among them was that this year promises to show an improvement as a pent-up desire for travel persuades many people to venture forth again.
Against that, the international market is likely to remain skewed by the overwhelming strength of the euro and the weakness of the dollar. For Americans, the report said, outbound travel from the US is expected to rebound as low inflation makes vacations accessible.
"Nevertheless, a weak dollar could stimulate domestic tourism as well as regional traffic while doubts remain whether long-haul travel to Europe will also bounce back," it said.
Of all the regions in the world, perhaps the most dramatic change in tourism came in one closely linked to the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq: the Middle East.
There, by the measure of international arrivals used in the document, tourism was up by around 10 percent from 27.6 million in 2002 to 30.4 million last year largely because of tourists from one country in the region going to another rather than face political and economic difficulties of more ambitious trips. Those travelers, the report said, were deterred by "envisaged difficulties in traveling to the Americas for political reasons and to Europe in view of the strong euro."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing