President Chen Shui-bian (
Holding large-scale rallies to show public support is a necessary tactic during the final, decisive stages of election campaigns. But the pan-blue camp has never been good at organizing mass rallies. Because the ticket of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Though it is a feeble attempt at imitation, it is a necessary effort for the pan-blue camp to make.
As for the purpose of the rally, it really doesn't matter. That was why the pan-blue camp initially planned to call its event an "anti-black gold" rally. Before long, however, the pan-blue camp found out that the theme amounted to political suicide because the Taiwanese public knows about the KMT's time-honored tactic of using local factions to consolidate central government power -- by allowing these factions to gobble up local resources.
The public is even more resentful about the KMT's tangled relationships with its cronies in business. "Black gold" was precisely the reason that the KMT lost the 2000 presidential election. Now, who can believe the KMT when it says it has transformed itself into an angel of justice, a crusader against black gold?
The KMT apparently saw an opportunity to brand the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) a corrupt "black gold" party after the media reported accusations from businesspeople like Chen Yu-hao (
But many questions remain about the accusations from Chen Yu-hao and Chang. Much of the media and the public have suspicions about the political motives behind their accusations. By hyping the "black gold" allegations against the DPP, the pan-blue camp may have also stoked the electorate's resentment of the KMT's corrupt politics. The pan-blue camp may have lost more than it has gained.
DPP people were greatly excited when the pan-blue camp said it wanted to organize an "anti-black gold" rally. Many DPP people said they would take part in the rally. This could have transformed the pan-blue rally into a pan-green rally.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) also poured cold water on the pan-blue camp, saying "Black gold people opposing black gold -- ludicrous." This set off alarm bells in the pan-blue camp, which then dropped the absurd idea of holding a rally against black gold.
In its anxiety, the pan-blue camp came very close to turning itself into a big joke.
Yesterday, the pan-blues gave up the idea of cheating the public with that ridiculous cause. Instead, they decided to use "Save Taiwan, replace the president" as the theme of the rally.
To flex muscle and grab power is the political purpose behind the pan-blue camp's rally.
The Feb. 28 Hand-in-Hand Rally is now on record as the largest mass rally in the country's history. Everyone is curious how the pan-blue camp plans to attract people to its rally on Saturday.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing