In the back of Greenbush General Store, in the heart of a tiny village an hour south of Canada's capital Ottawa, the locals get together twice a day to chew the fat over coffee and the odd cigarette.
What they are talking about should be enough to make Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and the local member of parliament, Joe Jordan, gag on their own coffee as they mull the next election, likely this year.
"Those Liberals, they're nothing but a bunch of [expletive deleted] crooks," came the opening volley from store owner Floyd Salmon.
Martin is eager to seek his own mandate as prime minister as soon as possible. He was elected in 1993, 1997 and 2000 as part of prime minister Jean Chretien's team, but he had his own ambitions and forced Chretien to step down in December after seizing control of the Liberal Party the month before.
Martin has done his best to portray himself as an honest agent of change, despite having served as Chretien's finance minister and most powerful cabinet member for eight-and-a-half years.
But Martin's message has been badly garbled en route to Greenbush, as well as to the rest of Canada, and suddenly Canada's grand old party looks entirely vulnerable in an election that had been expected to be called as early as May.
The Liberals have been racked by a number of scandals but none have struck a chord like the news this month of the "Sponsorgate" affair, where US$75 million evaporated in payments to agencies with close Liberal ties.
Polls show that that support for the party has slipped to a 12-year low of 35 to 36 percent, down from 48 percent before an explosive report was released by the federal auditor general on the spending scandal.
`Just isn't right'
"The son of a b ... should be hung, right along with Chretien," Earl Brayton said of Martin. "He's just as crooked as the rest of them."
Michael Curran, a stout man who describes himself as a jack-of-all-trades, nodded agreement, and also searched for the proper words to describe his displeasure with the Liberals' intention to legalize gay marriage.
"It's a thing that just isn't right," he finally declared.
Greenbush sits in the heart of a largely agricultural electoral district that Liberal Joe Jordan won in 2000 by a mere 55 votes out of a total of more than 47,000. And Jordan, like many Liberals in the electorally crucial provinces of Ontario and Quebec, will be in the fight of his political life to continue to represent it.
A few weeks ago pundits thought the loss of Jordan's and similar seats could cut into Martin's majority in parliament, but the stunning slide in the polls since the Sponsorgate news broke has raised the possibility of the Liberals being relegated to a minority government or even worse.
"When you add the marriage issue to Sponsorgate, I think it'll make for a very interesting election," said Jordan's likely rival, Gordon Brown of the newly merged Conservative Party.
The merger of two right-wing parties -- the Canadian Alliance and the slightly more liberal Progressive Conservatives -- has ended a split in the vote that has helped the Liberals to three straight parliamentary majorities.
If the Alliance and Conservatives votes were counted together in the 2000 federal election, they would have taken 25 of the 100 seats won by the Liberals in Ontario, including Jordan's seat.
The Conservatives promise more fiscal restraint, getting tougher on crime, a more robust military, and better relations with the US than the Liberals have had.
The next election must be held by November 2005, but the ruling party can call one any time and usually does so by the end of its fourth year in power -- meaning an election would normally be expected no later than this November.
A brand name
Jordan hopes the majority of those who voted for the old Conservatives are so-called Red Tories -- fiscally conservative but socially liberal -- who will vote for him rather than for the new Conservative Party, which has the benefit of a brand name stretching back into the 1800s.
In this district many people said they vote the way their families have always voted, whether Liberal or Conservative.
Conversations with two dozen citizens around the district failed to turn up any who voted for the Progressive Conservatives in 2000 and are thinking of going Liberal now.
And Jordan also has to worry about erosion of his core Liberal support, both over marriage and financial mismanagement.
Liberals have often found fertile political ground among Roman Catholics, but some have been turned off by the government's intention to legislate gay marriage.
"There's no way a Catholic today can be voting Liberal," said Tony Jozefowicz, a retired fighter pilot from Spencerville who voted Liberal in 2000 and for most of his life.
Jordan said he would not expect many opponents of gay marriage to vote for him, but Jozefowicz is an example of a former supporter who is bailing over marriage.
At the Quickie convenience store in Brockville, on the shores of the St Lawrence River, cashier Karie Smail is indifferent like many other young people on the marriage issue but she is seeing red about the diversion of public funds.
"There's so much that could have been done with that money ... that bothers me so much more," she said, adding that she had not decided how she would vote, if at all.
Jordan recognizes the challenge, particularly as Martin had built his reputation on running a string of balanced budgets.
"If we're arguing fiscal competence as one of our trump cards, these things aren't helpful," he said. "I think we are running the finances of the nation very competently, but it's clearly something they're going to pounce on."
Critical to the Liberals' fortunes will be whether Canadians eventually forgive them for the scandal.
They hold 169 of 301 seats in the House of Commons. In the run-up to Martin's taking power, his aides had looked to Quebec to make up for a possible loss of 20 Ontario seats.
But the financial scandal has reversed their fortunes in Quebec, which has 75 seats, so much so that unless the anger fades they would lose seats there too. To complete the Liberal challenge is resurgence on the left, especially in cities, from the minority New Democrats.
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
China last week announced that it picked two Pakistani astronauts for its Tiangong space station mission, indicating the maturation of the two nations’ relationship from terrestrial infrastructure cooperation to extraterrestrial strategic domains. For Taiwan and India, the developments present an opportunity for democratic collaboration in space, particularly regarding dual-use technologies and the normative frameworks for outer space governance. Sino-Pakistani space cooperation dates back to the end of the Cold War in the 1990s, with a cooperative agreement between the Pakistani Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission, and the Chinese Ministry of Aerospace Industry. Space cooperation was integrated into the China-Pakistan