On July 5, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared Taiwan free of new SARS infections.
Terrifyingly, the world's first case of SARS this winter was reported in Taiwan on Wednesday. Although this has borne out health authorities' warnings that SARS might stage a comeback during the winter, the Taiwanese people were still shocked when the prediction suddenly came true.
Luckily, this SARS case -- just like the one that was reported in Singapore in September -- involved a medical institution, the Graduate Institute of Preventive Medicine at Taipei's National Defense Medical Center, and so far has not spread to the public.
Although it is urgent that the patient's whereabouts during the past two weeks be investigated, the WHO has already announced that it will not declare Taiwan an infected area. Taiwanese people should not panic nor overreact, but it is necessary for us to take stock of our preparedness for another outbreak.
First, the lack of medical equipment and resources at medical institutions should have been addressed by now.
Second, we must ask where the weak points are in the nation's SARS prevention program. The recent cases in Singapore and Taiwan show that medical laboratories, where the virus is examined and vaccines are researched, are in fact very dangerous but easily ignored. The Cabinet's Department of Health (DOH) conducted safety checks at domestic SARS-related research units in September. After the recent case occurred, the DOH suspended operations at these units so as to carry out an investigation. It is therefore believed that the situation will not get out of control.
Third, it is important that information about the epidemic can be easily understood and that transparency be maintained. The reason SARS went out of control during the outbreak during the first half of the year was that China, where the disease started, ignored and even deliberately concealed information about SARS. The major decline in the Taiwanese stock market following news of the new infection also highlighted the fact that incomplete information only makes matters worse. Yesterday's reaction from the authorities, in which they gave an independent, quick and substantive explanation, received a positive reaction from the WHO. There is good reason to believe that the DOH and hospitals will be able to provide transparent information about future handling of the disease, both to put the people of Taiwan at ease and to avoid international overreactions that might be harmful to Taiwan.
Fourth, it is important to make sure that Taiwan's public health work can be thoroughly carried out, and that better public health habits can be implemented. As soon as the first wave of SARS was brought under control, health authorities went through various steps to train public health personnel, spread public health awareness and improve public health facilities. We will now find out if that personnel will be able to shoulder new responsibilities and whether overall public health conditions have improved. Provided basic preparations are thorough, there will be no room for SARS to once again spin out of control.
Finally, the public's psychological preparedness is an issue. The stock market saw an irrational decline following news of the new infection, only to rebound the next day. This shows that we all believe in Taiwan and the government's preparedness.
As long as the reappearance of SARS is dealt with in an orderly and serious way, we can be confident that the people of Taiwan will be able to handle the situation better than during the first half of the year. Then Taiwan will be able step out from the shadow of SARS.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath