The collapse of talks on the EU's first constitution leaves the bloc lurching toward a "big bang" enlargement next year with dysfunctional institutions in a mood of crisis and division.
Failure to agree at a weekend summit on a charter designed to ensure the EU can run efficiently after 10 new members join the existing 15 next May, means the Union's expansion beyond the old Iron Curtain is likely to be overshadowed by acrimony.
France and Germany, blocked in their bid for more voting power by Spain and Poland, responded by threatening to lead "pioneer groups" of like-minded countries towards closer integration, raising the prospect of a two-speed Europe.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
"The first few years of enlargement are going to be a very rocky ride," said Heather Grabbe, deputy director of the Centre for European Reform.
"This was a time when the Union needed to be strong, but it will actually be divided and weak, concentrating on battles over money, jobs and power," she said.
Saturday's breakdown capped a year in which the EU split bitterly over the US-led war in Iraq, its budget rules were bent, Sweden voted against joining the euro and Britain decided not even to put the choice to its skeptical voters.
The defining moment of this year may well have been when French President Jacques Chirac chided the EU's east European newcomers in February for siding with the US over Iraq, saying they had "missed a good opportunity to shut up."
Diplomats said animosity and mutual distrust among leaders, who put their national interest above any sense of a common European goal, was a factor in the collapse of the constitution negotiations and augurs ill for next year's big challenges.
Two years' work on a constitution, drafted by a Convention of lawmakers and national representatives led by former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, ended in a deadlock that will tarnish the EU's image with its citizens and in the world.
The unresolved struggle over voting rights is bound to become entwined with a looming battle over the next EU budget and will overhang the appointment of a new European Commission and the election of a new European Parliament next year.
After failing to secure more voting power for the EU's most populous state, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said Germany wanted the ceiling on the 2007 to 2013 budget reduced to 1 percent of gross national income (GNI), from 1.27 percent at present.
Although the EU's current 100 billion euro annual budget only amounts to one percent of GNI, such a tight corset would leave no extra cash to meet the huge development needs of the less wealthy new member states.
The EU was always likely to face strains digesting 10 new countries that will swell its population from 375 to 450 million and most leaders chose to play down the severity of the crisis they had unleashed on Saturday.
Britain said life would go on and the EU would simply apply the 2000 Nice treaty, which gave Spain and Poland almost as many votes as Germany, with twice their population.
But most experts doubt whether that rulebook, so complex and flawed that EU leaders sought to rewrite it almost before the ink was dry, can keep an enlarged Union moving forward.
"This EU of 25 or 27 cannot really work with the Treaty of Nice," said Daniel Gros, director of the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels.
Chirac said "pioneer groups" could move ahead in the fields of economics, defense, crime-fighting and immigration, as they had done to launch the euro single currency and the Schengen border-free area within the EU.
Founders France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg are exploring joint initiatives with a core of like-minded states, diplomats say. But many analysts doubt how far this will lead.
"This core Europe stuff is a pipe dream," Gros said, arguing that Paris and Berlin had forfeited much trust as leaders of the European project after they trampled on EU budget rules last month to avoid disciplinary action for their excessive deficits.
The leaders set no date to resume constitution negotiations, leaving a cooling-off period likely to extend beyond a Spanish general election in March and European elections in June.
Schroeder and Chirac may hope the financial leverage of the budget talks will force Spain and Poland to sue for peace on voting rights by 2005, but in such a poisoned atmosphere, that seems far from certain.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath