Japan's failed launch this weekend of a rocket carrying spy satellites has cast a shadow over its ambitions to lead Asia's space race, especially following China's successful manned space flight, experts said Sunday.
The unsuccessful launch Saturday of two spy satellites to monitor North Korea also dealt a severe blow to Tokyo's space defense programme, meant as a response to Pyongyang's military threat, they said.
A Japanese H-2A rocket with two spy satellites on board appeared to have lifted off smoothly from a launch site on the southern island of Tanegashima some 1,000km southwest of Tokyo.
But the space center decided to destroy the rocket and the satellites about 10 minutes after take-off after one of the two rocket boosters failed to separate from the fuselage in the second phase of the flight.
"With the failure, international trust in Japan's space technology has been damaged considerably," said Hideo Nagasu, former chief of Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency.
"The failure is seen in sharp contrast to China's remarkable success," Nagasu said of Beijing's launch into orbit last month of a Chinese astronaut, who circled the Earth 14 times during a 21-hour flight.
China, the world's newest space power, said last week it planned to send a spacecraft into orbit around the moon by 2007, while it is set to launch the first satellite in its "Double Star" project before the end of the year.
Japan's failure came after five consecutive successful rocket launches, which followed two straight failures in 1998 and 1999.
Experts forecast Japan will be forced to delay the planned launch of another H-2A rocket in February which was to carry a satellite to be used for weather observation.
The failure also means a major setback in Japan's plans to set up a satellite defense scheme after the successful launch in March of its first spy satellites, analysts said.
"It was a severe blow to its plan to begin satellite intelligence activities," said Hideshi Takesada, professor at the National Institute for defense Studies.
"Operating only two satellites is insufficient as we need 16 satellites ideally," Takesada said. "And North Korea's missile threat remains unchanged. Japan really needs to rush to look into the failure, fully review the program and relaunch more satellites as quickly as possible."
The satellite project, worth ?250 billion (US$2.3 billion), was intended as a response to North Korea's firing of a suspected Taepodong ballistic missile over Japan into the Pacific Ocean in August 1998 -- a move that sent shockwaves around the region.
The weekend's failed launch came at a sensitive time for Japan and North Korea as the two countries prepare to sit down at six-way talks to resolve the crisis over Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions.
North Korea denounced the deployment of the first two satellites as a "hostile act" which could trigger a renewed arms race.
"The failure is expected to have little impact on the upcoming six-way talks as North Korea still considers Japan's abilities in satellite defense to be low," said Hajime Izumi, professor of Shizuoka Prefectural University.
"I believe the North's missile threat is not imminent, but we have to be on alert when North Korea obtains technology to produce a nuclear warhead. That would be a real crisis," he said.
Despite being under the US security umbrella since the end of World War II, Japan awoke to the need for self-defense following a series of missile tests by North Korea.
"It was extremely regrettable as we have needed to strengthen our ability to collect intelligence," Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said on Saturday. "We will consider our future action while pursuing an investigation into the cause immediately, strictly and thoroughly."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath