The controversial Special Report VCD -- which contains personal attacks on People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) and other opposition politicians -- has led us to wonder: Apart from the freedom-of-speech issue, why have such alternative media appeared in Taiwan where the communication industry is highly developed?
Legislators are not the only ones who enjoy the freedom of speech. Many lawmakers who wag their tongues recklessly usually hide under the umbrella of legislative immunity. They often make irresponsible remarks and completely ignore the feelings of the accused. However, once they are criticized, they rush to court and file lawsuits.
Take Special Report for example. PFP Legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅), who was a National Taiwan University professor, filed a lawsuit against the production simply because he is called a "roaring beast" in the VCDs -- which sounds like the word "professor" in Chinese. On one hand, those lawmakers have lost their magnanimity in the face of public criticism. On the other hand, some of them have downgraded themselves to the status of domestic subjects of Soong by filing a lawsuit for him. If Soong feels wronged by the VCDs, he should file a lawsuit by himself.
Next, why have such VCDs appeared in Taiwan where the communication industry is highly developed and the number of broadcast channels is large? The Special Report VCD is considered alternative or underground. Such options appear when society's mainstream media only allow for one voice. They exist in many developing, or even developed, countries worldwide.
From the underground magazines during the tangwai (outside the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT]) movement in the two Chiang's (
Taiwan's television industry is well-developed today, as viewers often enjoy at least 70 to 80 channels. However, this situation is an example of US academic Theodore Peterson's criticism on newspaper liberalism 30 years ago. As he said, gigantic and centralized media may depart from the spirit of a free-speech market, as their owners attempt to achieve political or economic goals through them, sacrificing opposite opinions while boycotting social reforms. Under such circumstances, as he said, the media may become another social and economic class that hampers the freedom of speech and public interests as well.
Taiwan's TV stations have leaned toward commercial interests on the one hand and centralized political ideologies on the other. Most political commentary talk shows on TV are hosted by opposition politicians or those who lean toward the blue camp. As a result, rebuking President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has become a daily routine on those talk shows.
Under such circumstances, Special Report was produced because the voice of Taiwan's grassroots can hardly be heard in the so-called mainstream media. The Taiwanese people's freedom of speech should certainly be respected. Besides, the contents of the VCD are not completely worthless. The VCD, which alleges that Soong may have liver cancer, has reflected some people's doubts.
Freedom of speech is the foundation of democratic politics, and it should be protected and regulated by the law. Politicians should not be afraid of it, and they are not the only ones who enjoy it.
Cheng Tzu-leong is a professor in the Department of Advertising at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing