Death penalty moratorium
The recent move on Oct. 27 by the government to abolish the death penalty in Taiwan is a major breakthrough for the Asian region and one which deserves a lot more publicity than it has been given.
If the laws are approved by the legislature, Taiwan would become the Asian leader in human rights and the nation would join the ever-growing list of countries which have abolished the death penalty.
However, we urge the government to immediately proclaim a moratorium on the death penalty, prior to the culmination of the legislative process.
While the legislature discusses the merits of abolition, lawmakers should be aware of the ongoing miscarriage of justice in the case of three men -- commonly known as the Hsichih Trio -- who are once again facing the death penalty in a new trial despite being acquitted of their alleged crimes in January.
The three men have already spent seven years on death row and their trial has exposed serious flaws in the Taiwanese justice system, including the fact that the case against them is based almost entirely on their confessions -- confessions that were allegedly extracted through torture.
The allegations of torture and apparent lack of material evidence, coupled with extensive irregularities in the investigative process, including unlawful detentions and an illegal search, give grave cause for concern that there has been a miscarriage of justice in this case.
Amnesty International urges the Taiwanese authorities to consider the men's severe emotional distress, the need for an investigation into the allegations of torture and their recent move towards abolishing capital punishment when trying the three men.
Bella Luk
Director,
Amnesty International,Hong Kong
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath