China, sandwiched between a North Korea threatening to go nuclear and the US, which has proved willing and able to topple regimes, will press for one major outcome from six-way talks this week -- keep them talking.
Alarmed by the posturing of the two protagonists in the 10-month-old crisis over Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions, China has embarked on a rare spate of active diplomacy, sending envoys around the globe to bring the main players to the table.
Yesterday, as North and South Korea, the US, Japan and Russia joined China for three days of talks, Beijing was seeking to secure at a minimum a commitment to further dialogue, Chinese and Western analysts said.
"The most likely case scenario would be that all the sides will raise their most important demands during the talks," said Shi Yinhong, a professor at People's University.
"Three days is in no way adequate to address and resolve the problems, but I believe it will provide a platform for the participants to continue talking in the future."
Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星) has expressed optimism before the talks at the Diaoyutai State Guest House. But few analysts expect a breakthrough due to the gulf between North Korea and the US, which has branded reclusive Pyongyang part of an "axis of evil" along with Iran and pre-war Iraq.
Pyongyang has demanded a security guarantee, while the US says it won't give into blackmail and insists North Korea abandon its nuclear program before guarantees or aid are considered.
Beijing, wanting the crisis resolved peacefully, is eager to head off further escalation that could lead to a destabilizing North Korean collapse or even military conflict on its northeast border. China has its work cut out as honest broker.
"China has to engage in some masterful diplomacy to try to get two very stubborn friends to develop enough flexibility that there is enough overlap that a deal becomes at least feasible," said Kenneth Lieberthal, China expert at the University of Michigan.
Ominous signals from both the US and North Korean sides and the failure of talks in April spurred Beijing into a highly public bout of diplomacy after months of keeping a low profile despite US criticism.
Analysts said Beijing began to take more seriously North Korean statements it already had a nuclear weapons program. The US had demonstrated it could swiftly carry out a regime change with the overthrow of former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein.
The result was a series of high-level Chinese envoys shuttling to Pyongyang, Washington, Moscow, Japan and Seoul to bring about the latest round of talks.
"Dangerous indications from the US and dangerous indications from North Korea mobilized China to do more things for China's own national security," said Shi.
The crisis has placed Beijing in uncharted foreign policy territory -- taking a more high-profile diplomatic role but not quite certain where it is headed and hamstrung by a fear of backing unpredictable Pyongyang into a corner, analysts said.
"China is taking one step and looking around before taking another," said Jin Canrong, professor of International Relations at People's University.
"It is keeping a low profile but trying to push both sides to resolve the issue. China will not be too active."
The real test will come if talks collapse because North Korea puts pressure on a relationship once described as "close as lips and teeth" but which has cooled since China established diplomatic relations with South Korea in 1992.
If North Korea digs in, analysts expect China to toughen its tone and consider squeezing its unruly neighbor economically.
China is uniquely positioned to engage in subtle strong-arming of North Korea as provider of 70 percent of its food and fuel oil imports. Early this year, diplomats say, Beijing cut off an oil pipeline to North Korea for three days.
And analysts noted that Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesmen in June began declaring Beijing was "opposed to nuclear weapons on the Korean peninsula," a departure from the milder line that China "supported a nuclear-free Korean peninsula."
But with talks on North Korea's nuclear programme expected to last months, if not years, China faces foreign policy issues that are "very demanding, potentially very dangerous and may well become more and more dangerous over the next 18 months," Lieberthal said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath