Tall, slender, with long, black hair and softly spoken, there is nothing to suggest that Tokyo local councilor Aya Kamikawa is actually a man who has been on the waiting list for a sex-change operation for the last four years. \nDiagnosed in 1998 as suffering from Gender Identity Disorder (GID), Kamikawa, 35, has chosen to fight to have the voice of minorities such as hers heard in a country where, she says with pointed understatement, "prejudice is not unusual." \nIt is perhaps surprising then that she has so far succeeded beyond her expectations. \n"I wanted to stand for the local elections in my ward Setagaya to make my voice heard on GID and to represent the other minorities, who like myself have a hard time being accepted by society," she said. \nIn April, Kamikawa was the sole independent candidate elected as one of 52 local councilors, and now she busies herself with social and cultural issues affecting Setagaya's population of over 800,000 people. \nThis initial victory was followed by the passage through parliament in July of a new law allowing transsexuals to change their civil registration to reflect their new gender. \n"This new law hasn't affected my day-to-day life, but it has given me renewed hope for the future," Kamikawa said. \n"I am even hoping to marry my boyfriend," she said blushing and turning to the man with whom she shares her small traditional-style house, but who did not want to be identified. \nAbout 20 people have undergone sex-change surgery in Japan since the first operation was conducted in 1998. \nPrior to the new law, transsexuals who had completed surgical treatment faced embarrassment and prejudice because they could not alter their records -- needed to secure accommodation or a job -- to reflect their new gender and lead a normal life. \nKamikawa's battle to be accepted as a woman by society has cost her considerable personal suffering. \nAt first there was the sense of feeling alienated from -- and even hating -- her male body "which does not correspond to who I feel I really am." \nThen there was the loneliness of five years working in a publishing company where she was obliged to act out the role of the typical Japanese "salaryman." \nUnable to cope with the pressures imposed on the average company worker as well as her own identity disorder, Kamikawa became more and more introverted and drowned her sense of helplessness in alcohol. \nReaching the end of her tether in 1995, and suffering from a colon ulcer and other psychosomatic illnesses, Kamikawa resigned and "came-out." \nAt first her family and friends were shocked, but they supported her when she decided to stand for election, recognizing that "only I can know what is best for me," Kamikawa said. \nThe physical suffering followed, resulting from hormone treatment and the first surgical procedures, such as removal of the Adam's apple, an operation on her vocal chords to raise the pitch of her voice and hair removal by laser. \nToday, four years on and despite the prior agreement of doctors, Kamikawa is still waiting for the green light from a medical board in neighboring Saitama prefecture to undergo the final surgery that will allow her to "become a woman physically." \n"I want to be able to shower every day, and go to the toilet without suffering at the sight of my body. I dream of leading a normal life in which I can bathe in an onsen [hot-spring bath] together with my female friends," Kamikawa said. \nShe said her response to her mother who is worried about such drastic surgery is: "Just imagine what you would feel like if you woke up tomorrow with a penis inside your knickers." \nKamikawa's case is by no means unique. There are no official figures but there are estimated to be up to 7,000 people with GID in Japan, according to the Society of Trans and Gender Rights Advocates of the Philippines (STRAP). Kamikawa estimates the number to be 10 times higher. \nBut the time is still far off when most of them will feel able to "come out" too, she said. \n"Even if the new law helps transsexuals, the fight must go on to make the public at large more understanding and accepting."
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on