Tall, slender, with long, black hair and softly spoken, there is nothing to suggest that Tokyo local councilor Aya Kamikawa is actually a man who has been on the waiting list for a sex-change operation for the last four years.
Diagnosed in 1998 as suffering from Gender Identity Disorder (GID), Kamikawa, 35, has chosen to fight to have the voice of minorities such as hers heard in a country where, she says with pointed understatement, "prejudice is not unusual."
It is perhaps surprising then that she has so far succeeded beyond her expectations.
"I wanted to stand for the local elections in my ward Setagaya to make my voice heard on GID and to represent the other minorities, who like myself have a hard time being accepted by society," she said.
In April, Kamikawa was the sole independent candidate elected as one of 52 local councilors, and now she busies herself with social and cultural issues affecting Setagaya's population of over 800,000 people.
This initial victory was followed by the passage through parliament in July of a new law allowing transsexuals to change their civil registration to reflect their new gender.
"This new law hasn't affected my day-to-day life, but it has given me renewed hope for the future," Kamikawa said.
"I am even hoping to marry my boyfriend," she said blushing and turning to the man with whom she shares her small traditional-style house, but who did not want to be identified.
About 20 people have undergone sex-change surgery in Japan since the first operation was conducted in 1998.
Prior to the new law, transsexuals who had completed surgical treatment faced embarrassment and prejudice because they could not alter their records -- needed to secure accommodation or a job -- to reflect their new gender and lead a normal life.
Kamikawa's battle to be accepted as a woman by society has cost her considerable personal suffering.
At first there was the sense of feeling alienated from -- and even hating -- her male body "which does not correspond to who I feel I really am."
Then there was the loneliness of five years working in a publishing company where she was obliged to act out the role of the typical Japanese "salaryman."
Unable to cope with the pressures imposed on the average company worker as well as her own identity disorder, Kamikawa became more and more introverted and drowned her sense of helplessness in alcohol.
Reaching the end of her tether in 1995, and suffering from a colon ulcer and other psychosomatic illnesses, Kamikawa resigned and "came-out."
At first her family and friends were shocked, but they supported her when she decided to stand for election, recognizing that "only I can know what is best for me," Kamikawa said.
The physical suffering followed, resulting from hormone treatment and the first surgical procedures, such as removal of the Adam's apple, an operation on her vocal chords to raise the pitch of her voice and hair removal by laser.
Today, four years on and despite the prior agreement of doctors, Kamikawa is still waiting for the green light from a medical board in neighboring Saitama prefecture to undergo the final surgery that will allow her to "become a woman physically."
"I want to be able to shower every day, and go to the toilet without suffering at the sight of my body. I dream of leading a normal life in which I can bathe in an onsen [hot-spring bath] together with my female friends," Kamikawa said.
She said her response to her mother who is worried about such drastic surgery is: "Just imagine what you would feel like if you woke up tomorrow with a penis inside your knickers."
Kamikawa's case is by no means unique. There are no official figures but there are estimated to be up to 7,000 people with GID in Japan, according to the Society of Trans and Gender Rights Advocates of the Philippines (STRAP). Kamikawa estimates the number to be 10 times higher.
But the time is still far off when most of them will feel able to "come out" too, she said.
"Even if the new law helps transsexuals, the fight must go on to make the public at large more understanding and accepting."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath