On Wednesday, President Chen Shui-bian (
Only a day earlier Chen had indicated during a DPP Central Standing Committee meeting that "one country on each side [of the Taiwan Strait]" and "national referendums" are the central spirits of the party. Of course, who can forget there is the presidential election coming up next March. While no one doubts that Chen's comments on Wednesday are important components of his campaign platform, some people are confused about how "one country on each side" and "direct links before the end of next year" -- two seemingly conflicting concepts -- can accommodate each other?
Co-convener of the KMT-PFP alliance's publicity panel Su Chi (
So, the question then becomes what could possibly change China's mind between now and the end of next year? The answer is the re-election of Chen. In view of Beijing's stubborn insistence on the issue, that is of course only a possibility and not a sure thing. But, that possibility won't even exist with the election of the pan-blue candidates -- KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
With "one country on each side" as the main theme of his campaign platform, Chen's re-election would send a strong message to Beijing about what the people of Taiwan really think about the "one China" principle. This is what some people, including Chen, believe could change Beijing's mind, or at least stop it from making acceptance of its "one China" principle a precondition for negotiations.
Interestingly, although the pan-blue camp continues to criticize Chen's cross-strait policies, it has decided to focus its campaign platform on domestic issues. This is due to the fact that domestic issues are the Chen administration's biggest vulnerability and the pan-blue camp's realization that it is treading on a very thin line in terms of public appeals by adopting such a meek and self-demeaning stance in the cross-strait relationship. While people prefer positive and constructive cross-strait relationships, they also cannot help but find political parties that roll over to each and every command and wish of Beijing
repulsive.
The pan-blues will find out pretty soon that their plan to shy away from discussion about the cross-strait relationship and sovereignty issues in the presidential campaign simply won't work. This is not only because the DPP won't let it, but also because these issues are on the top of the people's priority list. To achieve a mutually beneficial and stable relationship with China and at the same time not compromise Taiwan's sovereignty is a tough job. At the very least Chen has accomplished the latter. As for the former, cooperation from Beijing will be
required.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath