What do South Africa, Lithuania, Mexico and China have in common?
Not much, really. Yet all four are lumped into an economic category known as emerging markets -- one that casts its net so wide that its relevance is being questioned.
"This concept of an emerging or a developing market is mainly a political tag or just a name for non-rich economies," said Dawie Roodt, an economist with PLJ Financial Services in South Africa.
"It's really everybody except the rich economies so it's really not saying anything. It's far too big," he said.
The term's worth as a concept is not simply academic.
It is used as a guide by fund managers and others who channel tens of billions of dollars into economies -- and out of them again -- sometimes at the press of a button.
Nor has much thought been given to the criteria that would signal an economy had emerged from its stifling cocoon and sprouted the wings of a developed one.
Making it out of this grouping would signal that a country was a less risky place for investment. This in turn could translate into increased capital inflows and reduced borrowing costs.
To date, no economy seems to have made the grade, suggesting that perhaps it is time to establish some goal posts -- though the pick of the crop are often singled out.
"A lot of people will look at very mature emerging markets like South Korea or Hong Kong and not include them in this group, they are almost in a category of their own," said Razia Khan, an economist with Standard Chartered in London.
What is an emerging market?
So, what is an emerging market? At its broadest, it refers to basically every country outside of the developed world encompassing Western Europe, the US and Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.
The Reuters glossary says it is: "A term used to describe the financial markets of developing countries. Definitions vary of which countries are emerging and which are not."
There are some common countries on the major emerging markets indices, including Brazil, Hungary and Thailand.
The Economist newspaper has regular updates on indicators from around two dozen emerging market economies.
Countries with unsophisticated, illiquid or virtually no financial markets such as Cambodia and Burundi are not found on these indices, but are still considered by some to be in the "emerging" group for want of an alternative classification.
"There are a lot of developing countries that are strictly pre-emerging markets rather than emerging markets," Khan said.
One rough rule of thumb could be to look at countries whose government debt has been given a credit rating by the big rating agencies.
But in Africa, that group includes Gambia, Lesotho, Egypt, South Africa and Botswana, countries with hugely different levels of development.
The "market" in the term also seems, in many cases, to state the obvious.
Fifteen years ago the very visible hand of the state was firmly on the tiller of eastern Europe's economies, but most today are clearly market-oriented, selling off state assets while maintaining low budget deficits.
Their size may mean they are still "emerging," but few would doubt that they were now "markets." Billions and billions of dollars of foreign direct investment have poured into the region.
South African exception
Then there is the case of South Africa.
South Africa's economy is in many ways a dual one, a legacy of its recent past under apartheid and white rule.
On the one hand, its financial markets are as liquid and sophisticated as many found in the developed world.
Its top companies -- some of which have moved their main listings to London -- are global giants and include the likes of mining major Anglo American and SABMiller, the world's second largest brewer.
On the other hand, many of its roughly 45 million people live in abject poverty, and income disparities are among the sharpest on the planet. Unemployment is close to 40 percent.
While there has been progress on many fronts, millions still lack proper sanitation and electricity.
In short, the majority live a "Third World" existence, while a minority is part of the "First World" -- hence South Africa's emerging market tag.
But this means it gets punished when there are scares or sell-offs in other big emerging markets, such as Russia or Brazil -- even if its own economic policies are sound and its financial markets are far more sophisticated.
Some far-off investors have also lumped South Africa -- unfairly, most analysts would say -- with neighboring Zimbabwe, whose economy is suffering its worst crisis since independence from Britain in 1980.
"I think what we need to do is get a bit more clinical on how we classify certain economies," said Roodt.
"One could be developing and that would be one that is actually growing at a certain rate. Another would be stagnant, an economy where not much is happening. Another could be regressive or 'undeveloping' like Zimbabwe," Roodt said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing