Renewable energy has found itself under the microscope in the debate about the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant. The president and the premier have both said that renewable energy must be one of their nation's top priorities. The Legislative Yuan also passed a statute concerning the development of renewable energy, which makes us feel that we can look toward the goal of producing more than 10 percent of total domestic power from renewable sources by 2020.
In fact, the development of renewable energy is a common goal worldwide, mainly due to fears over global warming. We have no choice but to pay special attention to the issues of environmental protection and carbon-dioxide control as well as look for alternative sources of energy supply. The market for renewable energy facilities has therefore flourished in recent years.
Take the wind turbine generator for example. Since 1995, the global capacity of power generation from wind-power sources has increased five-fold. In the last seven years, the annual growth rate in the setup of solar-energy facilities has reached as high as 35 percent. In Denmark, power generation from wind-power sources contributes 18 percent of the country's total power supply. Denmark has by far the highest percentage of energy supply generated from wind power sources in the world.
In other words, whether the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant will continue or not, the development of renewable energy is a policy that we will not regret pursuing. It is in accord with the international trend of sustainable development. For this reason, we should plan it outside the framework of political thinking.
Although the market opportunities for renewable energy look promising at home and abroad, it is a pity that the market for renewable energy will probably continue to be monopolized by a few major international manufacturers. So, the question before us is, where can domestic manufacturers find their opportunities?
At present, the global market for wind turbine generators is monopolized by Germany, Denmark, Spain and the US, with Germany and Denmark sharing 40 percent of the global market. For solar-energy generators, Japan occupies more than 30 percent of the market. Even if we subsidize various industries to encourage renewable-energy use, we would be in a disadvantageous position because most of the commercial profits would be absorbed by foreign manufacturers.
One real-life example is our country's three large wind power plants, whose generator units came from Denmark and Germany. We built more than 20 large garbage incinerators that can recycle energy resources from waste materials, but the bids for the multi-billion-NT dollar plant construction projects were won by European and Japanese manufacturers and our domestic manufacturers could only make minor profits from labor-intensive construction activities.
There were no abuses or corrupt practices involved, but we had to give up profit-making opportunities because of our inferior position in technology and experience. Therefore, when we promote the use of renewable energy, I believe it is equally important to promote the autonomy of our domestic manufacturers in providing renewable energy facilities and equipment.
In the fast-growing global market of renewable energy, our domestic manufacturers definitely have excellent conditions and opportunities to develop wind turbines and resource application of solar energy and waste materials, because our industrial foundation of electric machinery is quite solid. A traditional industry such as electric machinery has become domestically saturated and has therefore tended to move abroad.
We can probably revitalize this traditional industry and encourage the manufacturers to keep their roots in Taiwan by guiding this traditional industry to take on new opportunities in those wind-power facilities that do not require a high technological threshold. Except for some key technologies such as blade structure that should be cooperated on with major international manufacturers, there should not be any problems with increasing the domestic-manufacturing rate of components such as power transmission and distribution systems, braking systems and towers. And if we can add various technology such as system engineering or meteorological and site assessments, our entry into the global market can be expected soon.
In addition, it is possible for our semiconductor industry with a solid technological foundation to add their high-tech expertise to solar-energy facilities. The recycling of wafer plants' waste materials can be a good opportunity to greatly lower the production costs of solar-cell materials. What is important is the government must have a clear-cut strategy to promote the participation and cooperation in wafer plants.
The "user end" and the "provider end" should therefore work at the same time to develop renewable energy. After the renewable-energy industry becomes autonomous, the improvement of technical capabilities and the expansion of production capacities will naturally help to lower the power-generation cost of renewable energy and bridge the gap between the prices of traditional and renewable energy. At that time, we will have better inducements to encourage the use of renewable energy among all walks of life and naturally increase domestic power-generation capacity from renewable sources.
The government should take action to make such a "positive cycle" happen.
Chen Wen-ching is a researcher at the Energy and Resources Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath