First, a hit television epic challenging official history was yanked off the air. Then came a blatant about-face by a health official, an opaque Shanghai banking probe and abrupt curbs on the press.
The developments, Chinese sources say, signal inner strife between increasingly confident Communist Party boss Hu Jintao (
They said Jiang, who remains chief of the nation's vast military machine, had made calculated stabs to reassert his authority in recent weeks. Hu supporters have cried foul.
"It's not an overt struggle. It's a covert struggle," said one party official of an intrigue unfolding at a critical juncture.
Hu was preparing to mark the party's birthday last Tuesday with a speech expected to touch on "inner party democracy."
In the run-up to the event, journalists and intellectuals fuelled hopes Hu would push for faster systematic change and increased openness after the embarrassing cover-up of the SARS epidemic and a rash of legal scandals.
But analysts see the cautious Hu taking only small steps toward political reform, particularly with Jiang still in the wings.
"Under these circumstances, Hu has to be careful," said one party newspaper editor. "He will not bring up much that is new."
Hu, 60, was once seen as prone to pressure by Jiang and his allies known as the "Shanghai Gang." But by declaring an all-out "people's war" on SARS, he has established himself quicker than expected since becoming president in March.
By contrast, Jiang drew flak after the army's initial refusal to disclose SARS cases, the dismissal of health minister Zhang Wenkang (張文康) -- once Jiang's personal physician -- and the aloofness of his camp during the SARS campaign. The Shanghai probe into improper loans to property barons could also taint Jiang allies.
Frictions have surfaced.
Early last month, talk spread that party elders had written a letter urging Jiang to retire.
The petition, signed by Hu's patron Song Ping (
"They basically wrote, `Your handling of SARS and other matters is affecting the current leaders' leadership.'"
Jiang, 76, has not taken criticism lying down.
"The West is capitalizing on the Iraq war and SARS to pressure China. That's what Jiang is saying," the editor said.
In late May, when Hu made his first trip abroad as president to Russia and France, Jiang swooped into Beijing from his home in Shanghai, three sources said.
The first person he met was Zhang, they said. The two nibbled dumplings, another editor added, in a meeting clearly aimed at exculpating the disgraced health boss.
Then on May 30, vice health minister Gao Qiang (
But state media criticized Gao and, one source said, superiors rebuked him. Two weeks later, he reversed himself, blaming Zhang for the slow response to SARS and the weakness of the health system.
In Hu's absence, Jiang also made an abortive bid to have his closest ally, Vice President Zeng Qinghong (
A Jiang ally proposed the move, which could have set a precedent for Zeng, fifth in the party hierarchy and chief pretender, to replace Hu at top meetings. Other leaders objected, they said.
Official media are exhorting renewed study of Jiang's "Three Represents" theory to widen the party's base; Hu has also paid tribute. There has been only isolated fanfare about "inner party democracy."
While some scholars say Hu could raise specifics like local multi-candidate elections, others say he is more likely to be vague.
"The ghost of Jiang Zemin lingers," one said.
Party censors banned free reporting on sensitive subjects, particularly the Shanghai probe, and analysts expect Jiang allies in the Politburo to escape the fallout from the investigation.
Gang Lin, of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said the leadership line-up was carefully balanced. "No one can easily break it."
The sources said Hu was behind the cancellation of a television drama that portrayed a more sympathetic view of Empress Dowager Cixi (1835 to 1908), traditionally vilified as a tyrant who ruled from behind the curtain -- reflecting well on Jiang and poorly on Hu.
"Hu has new ideas, but what does he do? He still does things the old way," said the party editor. "This system runs the way it runs. He has to rely on this system to realize his own ideas."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing