Taiwan has finally been removed from the World Health Organization's (WHO) SARS travel advisory list. The initial euphoric response upon hearing the news was quickly dispelled by reflection on the two-month-long SARS nightmare that placed several thousand people in quarantine, saw more than 600 people infected and killed 83 people, including seven health-care workers.
Then there have been the political travails as Taiwan was discriminated against by the WHO and insulted by China at the World Health Assembly last month. Not only that, but former Department of Health director-general Twu Shiing-jer (
Since the days of Japanese rule, doctors have have played the role of social, political and moral leaders in Taiwan. They took an active role in human rights and democracy movements. They also enjoyed high social status and respect from the people. The Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan represents the best of the best among them. The group has been active in social reform movements since its inception. Since 1997, it has also been one of the most active groups pushing for Taiwan's entry into the WHO, sending delegations to Geneva every year to lobby for Taiwan.
However, if we look at the SARS outbreak at the Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital, we can also see some careless and negligent doctors who were not vigilant about anti-SARS precautions. Even after the hospital was sealed off, some doctors refused to undergo quarantine and sent letters accusing the government of mishandling the hospital quarantine. Then there was the doctor who traveled abroad -- even though he had attended to SARS patients -- thereby causing panic in other countries. The doctor's carelessness also reflects the loopholes in Taiwan's medical ethics education.
The National Taiwan University Hospital, the country's top medical institution, has people like Chang Shang-chwen (
Taiwan was invited to the WHO's global SARS conference in Kuala Lumpur this week. Despite China's attempts to sideline it, the nation still participated -- with a smile -- hoping to make its voice heard in the international community.
Being removed from the travel advisory does not mean that the fight against SARS is over. Taiwan still has a much more difficult mission to accomplish -- to be removed from the WHO's list of SARS-affected areas.
Taiwan cannot afford to be pessimistic, even though its wish of joining the WHO has not been fulfilled. The fight against SARS is only the first step. Being invited to attend a WHO conference is only the beginning of a long journey, one that can be achieved step by step.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath