As the SARS outbreak in Taiwan escalates, we hear official reports on the number of reported, sus-pected and probable SARS cases, as well as fatalities, every day.
Looking at these figures, has anyone noted that of all SARS-affected countries, Taiwan has the highest mortality and infection rates among nursing personnel? Is the nurses' professional training insufficient? Or do they not know how to protect themselves? It is neither.
To show the Cabinet's appreciation for medical staff treating SARS patients, Premier Yu Shyi-kun announced on April 27 that each doctor treating SARS patients would receive NT$10,000 per day and each nurse NT$3,000. Shouldn't the bonuses reflect the degree of danger each professional is exposed to? The amount given to nurses shows how little regard the nursing profession is given here.
When caring for SARS-infected people, nurses have to stand by their beds to draw out their phlegm, give injections and turn over and wash the patients. Their length of contact with patients is definitely greater than anyone else. Is the danger they face merely one-third of that facing doctors? Or are their lives worth only one-third of physicians?
In the anti-SARS war in this country, why have the nursing staff suffered such heavy casualties? Is it because nurses were not informed by hospitals that they were caring for SARS patients, causing them to be lax about taking precautions? Or did the hospitals fail to provide them with sufficient protective equipment? Did they have to work overtime without getting enough rest? Or were they taxed by unrelenting demands and criticism and unable to relieve the psychological pressure, they pushed themselves to the verge of collapse? Isn't the high casualty rate among nursing staff an issue that deserves the attention of authorities?
Nurses endure difficult working conditions and long hours. For example, when caring for SARS patients in isolation wards, nurses have to muffle themselves up in three-layers of air-tight, heavy isolation suits. Nurses in countries such as China work four hours per shift. But here, each shift is over eight hours. Nurses also have to suffer the humiliation of unreasonable remuneration. It is really inhumane.
Taiwan's nurses have long been the disadvantaged majority in the medical world. They are a silent group, carrying the biggest workload but receiving the low-est salaries. When hospitals want to reduce their costs, nurses are the first to be laid off. The nursing staff is viewed as a unit which spends money without making contributions. They face streamlining, wage cuts and growing quality demands.
In many countries, physicians are paid three to five times more than nurses. In Taiwan, however, doctors can make six to 10 times the salary of a nurse.
Nursing education did not teach us to be calculating or to pursue our rights and interests. Mentioning money is even viewed as a vulgarity, especially when fighting diseases and disasters. However, were it not for a handful of people stepping forward to speak out on the second day of Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital's closure , I don't know how many more people would have died inside that den of contagion.
If we remain silent, nurses will be sacrificed. How then can they contribute? How can the burnt-out candles light up other people's lives? We want neither the title of anti-SARS heroes or heroines, nor the glory of being placed in the Martyrs Shrine.
We are willing to give but should not be overlooked. We would like to dedicate ourselves but will not make meaningless sacrifices. The authorities must speed up the formulation of measures to protect nurses' rights and interests.
Tseng Jean-lie is chairwoman of the National Union of Nurses' Associations.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing