Save dragon boat races
SARS used to be something that was just annoying -- the news seemed to report little else and when you talked to people it was like talking to Kenny from South Park. Now the Ministry of Education's Dragon Boat Committee has canceled the races set for the end of this month and early June. It is deeply disappointing to those of us who have joined a team, been practicing hard every day, gotten closer to one another and maybe even started to enjoy getting up early for 6:30am practice.
Precaution is good, overreaction is not. The committee has taken a drastic step and I just wonder if there's not some sort of compromise where the dragon boat competition could still be held without sacrificing safety. I think I speak for my team when I say we would not be averse to wearing masks, having our temperatures taken or any other measures the committee thinks appropriate, just so long as we can race.
Because of SARS we have to adjust our way of life, not end it. We've worked incredibly hard, hard enough to give any team damn good competition, and hard enough to earn a chance to make the Dragon Boat Committee reconsider its decision and allow the races to proceed.
Andy Outerbridge
Taipei
Conspiracy theorists wrong
Jeffrey Sachs' article ("US crony capitalists go to war," May 6, page 9) is nothing new and typical of leftist "it's about the oil" opinion. Sachs tries to prove the George W. Bush administration's guilt by digging up any oil-industry association of US Cabinet members.
First, if it was indeed about the oil, the US would have invaded Venezuela instead. Venezuela is closer, smaller, produces plenty of oil and boasts a government that is having a hard time calming its citizens. Such a war would have saved the US and its taxpayers a lot of money. But that did not happen. Why? Because Iraq was a threat to the US and the world. It was not about the oil.
Second, it's normal for Cabinet members to be successful in corporate America before their careers as politicians or policymakers. Their resum?s most definitely undergo public scrutiny, but others seem to enjoy conjuring up conspiracy theories to back absurd opinions.
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice also served on the board of governors of the San Francisco Symphony. Is the US attempting to influence Iraqis' taste in music after the war?
Lastly, the Bush administration is concentrating on Iraq's oil industry simply because that's what will bring the nation the most money to aid in reconstruction. Imagine the US suggesting that Iraqis export sand in order to make money. Oil is Iraq's most valuable export good, and that's what will bring Iraq back to its feet.
Eugene Liu
Atlanta, Georgia
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath